met

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "met" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used in various contexts, typically to indicate an encounter or introduction to someone. Example: "I met her at the conference last year."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Sport

Travel

Politics

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

I met a man who sometimes lets me sleep at his house but I have to wait outside for him to come home at 10 or 11pm and I get very cold.

The Guardian

And I've met the leaders of leaders.

The Economist

My parents met on a ship.

The New York Times

"I met in Damascus a president who was very aware of the critical situation," said Salehi, who saw the Syrian leader two weeks ago.

The Guardian

1) A late entry, but a brilliant one, from Massimo Gobbi, who met Jaime Valdés's cross with one of the most perfect outside-of-the-boot volleys you are ever likely to see.

The Guardian - Sport

"She met the prime minister of Pakistan, and performed in Islamabad to thousands of people," it says.

The Guardian

Wolff had studied architecture and design and had been working in a small London design partnership when they met and started their groundbreaking brand consultancy Wolff Olins in 1965.

The Guardian

I met him only after I became master of St Peter's College, Oxford, but he had a palpable gift for friendship and within minutes of our first encounter he was coming up with schemes and plots to help the college.

The Guardian

As I met world leaders at the G20 in Brisbane, the problems were plain to see.

The Guardian - Opinion

We met up in Dubai and wrote it, then we went away to execute it.

The Guardian

When you met at college, did you have any inkling about Stephen's health?

The Guardian

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When describing past events, ensure the context clearly indicates whether "met" refers to a single encounter or a series of meetings.

Common error

Avoid using "meet" instead of "met" when referring to past encounters. "Meet" is present tense, while "met" is the past tense form.

Linguistic Context

The primary grammatical function of "met" is as the past tense and past participle of the verb "meet". Ludwig examples demonstrate its use in describing completed actions of encountering someone or something. It's used to report a past interaction or fulfillment.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

30%

Sport

20%

Politics

15%

Less common in

Travel

10%

Formal & Business

10%

Science

5%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "met" serves as the past tense and past participle of "meet", denoting a completed action of encountering or fulfilling. Ludwig AI confirms its correctness and usability in written English. Its frequency is very common, particularly in news, sports, and political contexts. While versatile, awareness of tense and appropriate register is important. Alternatives like "encountered" or "came across" may suit different nuances. Understanding these aspects ensures effective and accurate use of "met" in various writing scenarios.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

encountered

Implies a chance meeting or unexpected encounter.

came across

Similar to encountered, suggesting an unplanned meeting.

had an appointment with

Suggests a prearranged meeting.

were introduced to

Focuses on the act of being formally introduced.

converged

Describes different things or people coming together at a specific location.

fulfilled

Indicates that requirements or expectations were satisfied.

satisfied

Emphasizes the act of meeting expectations or needs.

complied with

Focuses on adhering to rules or requests.

shook hands with

Emphasizes a greeting formality of the meeting

made contact with

Highlights the act of establishing communication or a connection.

FAQs

How can I use "met" in a sentence?

You can use "met" to describe a past encounter, such as "I "met" her at a conference" or "They "met" to discuss the project".

What's the difference between "meet" and "met"?

"Meet" is the present tense form of the verb, while "met" is the past tense and past participle. Use "met" when referring to something that happened in the past.

What can I say instead of "met"?

Depending on the context, you can use alternatives like "encountered", "came across", or "had an appointment with".

Is it correct to say "have met" or "had met"?

Yes, both are correct depending on the timeline you want to express. "Have met" indicates an encounter that happened at some point in the past and is relevant to the present, while "had met" indicates an encounter that happened before another point in the past.