merging with

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "merging with" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to describe two things coming together, as in the example sentence: "The two companies merged with each other to form a larger organization."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Academia

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

A theater merging with a choreographer's company?

The New York Times - Arts

It helped Price Waterhouse in merging with Coopers & Lybrand.

The New York Times

The information highway is rapidly merging with the asphalt variety.

The New York Times

In February, it announced that it was merging with Women.com.

The New York Times

"I can get there faster by merging with Celera".

The New York Times

Paddy Power has announced it is merging with Betfair.

The Guardian - Business

For many companies, merging with another was the only option.

The New York Times

He has publicly proposed merging with Vote Leave.

The Guardian

Instead of merging with the NFL, the USFL simply flopped.

The Washington Post

For some people, merging with robots makes sense.

The Guardian - Lifestyle

Sometimes, galaxies can "grow" by merging with one another.

Cornell University

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "merging with", ensure that the subjects involved are compatible and that the resulting combination makes logical sense. For example, it's appropriate to say "the company is merging with another" but less so to say "the idea is merging with the wall".

Common error

Avoid using "merging with" when only one entity is significantly changed or absorbed. If one company simply buys another, "acquiring" is more accurate than "merging with".

Linguistic Context

The phrase "merging with" functions as a prepositional phrase, typically following a verb to indicate a process of combination or integration. This use is supported by Ludwig, as shown in numerous examples where "merging with" describes companies, organizations, or even abstract concepts joining together.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

45%

Academia

25%

Science

15%

Less common in

Formal & Business

5%

Reference

3%

Social Media

2%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "merging with" is a versatile prepositional phrase used to describe the process of combining two or more entities. Ludwig AI confirms its grammatical correctness and widespread usage across various contexts, especially in News & Media, Academia, and Science. To ensure proper usage, remember that "merging with" implies a relatively equal combination, unlike "acquiring", where one entity absorbs another. When seeking alternatives, consider phrases like "combining with" or "integrating with", depending on the specific nuance you wish to convey. By following these guidelines, you can effectively incorporate "merging with" into your writing.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

combining with

Emphasizes the act of joining together.

integrating with

Highlights the process of becoming unified.

uniting with

Stresses the creation of a single entity.

consolidating with

Focuses on strengthening through combination.

fusing with

Suggests a blending of elements.

amalgamating with

Implies a mixing to form a unified whole.

blending with

Conveys a smooth combination.

coalescing with

Indicates a growing together.

incorporating into

Highlights the process of including something within a larger entity.

affiliating with

Suggests a formal association.

FAQs

How can I use "merging with" in a sentence?

You can use "merging with" to describe two or more entities combining to form a single entity. For instance, "The two companies are "merging with" each other to create a larger, more competitive firm."

What are some alternatives to "merging with"?

Depending on the context, you can use alternatives like "combining with", "integrating with", or "uniting with".

Is there a difference between "merging with" and "acquiring"?

Yes, "merging with" implies a more equal combination of entities, while "acquiring" suggests one entity taking over another. When two companies of similar size "merge with" each other, they combine their resources and become a single company. In an acquisition, one company purchases and absorbs another.

When is it incorrect to use "merging with"?

It's generally incorrect to use "merging with" when describing a simple addition or attachment. For instance, saying "The color is "merging with" the background" is less precise than saying "The color blends into the background" if there's no actual combination of elements.