merge with

USAGE SUMMARY

"merge with" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when two distinct entities combine to form one single entity. For example: "The two companies merged with each other to form one large corporation."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Wiki

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

We merge with it.

The Guardian - Music

I merge with them.

The Guardian - Arts

"You have to merge with the sled.

The New Yorker

You don't merge with rocks.

The New York Times - Arts

Later, these merge with your personality.

The New Yorker

So why merge with another league?

The Guardian - Sport

Quotations like that merge with fashion statements and become issues.

The New York Times - Sports

Yukos tried and failed to merge with Sibneft.

The New York Times

The Spanish government quashed Telefonica's attempt to merge with KPN.

The New York Times

Would Diageo merge with Heineken to prevent any of this?

The Guardian - Business

The latter story could merge with this one.

The Guardian

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "merge with", ensure that the subjects are compatible and that the combination creates a cohesive whole. For instance, "The small stream will merge with the larger river."

Common error

Avoid using "merge with" when describing actions where subjects remain separate entities. For example, instead of saying "The attendees merged with the crowd", consider "The attendees joined the crowd".

Linguistic Context

The phrase "merge with" functions as a verb phrase indicating the action of combining or joining together, typically resulting in a unified entity. Ludwig AI confirms its correctness. The examples show its wide use in diverse topics, ranging from business deals to spiritual concepts.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

55%

Science

25%

Wiki

10%

Less common in

Formal & Business

5%

Encyclopedias

3%

Reference

2%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "merge with" is a versatile and grammatically sound phrase used to describe the combination of two or more entities into a single unit. Ludwig AI validates its correctness, and numerous examples highlight its broad applicability across contexts like business, science, and general discussions. While alternatives like ""combine with"" or "integrate with" exist, the choice depends on the specific nuance you wish to convey. Understanding its proper usage, as well as common errors to avoid, will enhance clarity and precision in your writing.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

combine with

Focuses on the act of joining two or more things together.

integrate with

Emphasizes blending elements into a functional whole.

unite with

Highlights the coming together of entities for a common purpose.

fuse with

Suggests a more permanent and inseparable bond.

blend with

Focuses on mixing elements to create a homogenous result.

coalesce with

Implies gradual combination into a single mass or body.

amalgamate with

Suggests mixing or blending different elements.

meld with

Highlights the process of combining or blending.

incorporate into

Focuses on including something as part of a larger whole.

join with

Emphasizes the act of becoming connected or united.

FAQs

How can I use "merge with" in a sentence?

You can use "merge with" to describe the combination of two or more things into one. For example, "The company plans to "combine with" a competitor to increase market share".

What are some alternatives to "merge with"?

Alternatives include phrases like ""combine with"", "integrate with", or "unite with", depending on the specific context.

Is it correct to say "merges into" instead of "merge with"?

While "merge into" can also be correct, it has a slightly different nuance. "Merge with" implies a mutual combination, whereas "merge into" suggests one thing becoming part of another. For example, a small road might "merge into" a highway.

What is the difference between "merge with" and "coalesce with"?

"Merge with" generally refers to a deliberate or planned combination, while "coalesce with" suggests a more gradual, natural process of coming together. So the best option is strictly related to the context.