Sentence examples for mean total lesion from inspiring English sources

The mean total lesion volumes were similar: 11.1 cm3 (range, 0.7-49 cm3) and 9.8 cm3 (range, 0.4-52 cm3), respectively, for hips with HG-1 and PCA components (P =.32).

In FVF2128g, the total area of CNV, total area of leakage, and mean total lesion area decreased with ranibizumab compared with UC (Heier et al. 2006a).

At the last MRI scan, the percentage change in mean total lesion volume from baseline in the two treatment groups was −2.1% and 15.4%, respectively (P < 0.0001).

Complete clearance rates were 30% for imiquimod versus 3% for vehicle, with mean total lesion reductions of 87% versus 50%, respectively.

Mean total lesion size (largest linear dimension ± SEM) measured 3184 ± 231.48 microns in the 50 eyes (66.7%) in which this parameter was available.

After 6 weeks, the mean total lesion count and mean severity index of acne showed significant reductions of 58% and 39%, respectively.

The first mixing revealed a mean total skin lesion score (mean ± SEM) of 140.9 ± 57.5 in H animals and of 98.6 ± 39.2 in L animals, respectively.

Data analyses presented minor hypothesis test to prove the delta difference in variable of mean total AV lesion and Mann Whitney unpaired differential test was performed for DHT level.

As a result of study for 12 weeks we found difference in delta of total AV lesion in group that was given 160-mgs/day soybean isoflavone supplementation i.e., −76.8 ± 28.35, this was larger than difference in mean total AV lesion in control group i.e. −0.2 ± 10.97.

The difference or the delta of total AV lesion in group that was given 160-mgs/day soybean isoflavone supplementation was −76.8 ± 28.35, this was greater than the delta of mean total AV lesion in control group i.e. −0.2 ± 10.97.

(Table 3 ) > Differential paired t test was performed on the difference in mean total AV lesion before and after treatment in control group and insignificant difference was found (P > 0.05), and differential paired Wilcoxon Signed Ranks test was performed on treatment group and significant difference was found (P < 0.05).