Sentence examples for mean h index from inspiring English sources

The authors found that the mean h index for successful applicants (arithmetic mean = 3.84, median = 3) for post doctoral research fellowships was statistically significantly higher than the mean h index for non-successful applicants (arithmetic mean = 2.72, median = 2) and that the applicants' h index values correlate significantly with their publication and citation numbers.

A regression on the mean h index showed the mean h index was similar in the Netherlands, the United Kingdom, and the United States.

As mentioned, among general surgeons in Ontario, mean h index by academic rank was lecturer 1.0 ; assistant professor 2.9; associate professor 7.3; and full professor 23.1 (14).

The mean h index was 14 for the Netherlands, 13 for the United Kingdom, 12 for the United States, 7 for Canada, 4 for Australia, and 3 for Germany.

The mean h index of the other three countries was significantly different (P<0.000) from that of the United Kingdom Germanyy (95% confidence interval −11.69 to −8.48), Canada (−8.33 to −5.14), and Australia (−10.50 to −7.21) On the basis of this comparison between six countries, UK researchers from primary care with a high volume of publications are internationally competitive.

In the neurosurgery mean h indices were 4.9 or assistant professors, 8.3 for associate professors, 10.1 for professors, and 14.8 for chair- persons.

(a) The mean h-index error ( bin width = 20, error bars displaying standard deviation) is decreasing for clusters with higher h-index.

For the seven model parameters ( α A, α S, α R, α C, β 2, β 3, β 4, while β 1 is fixed to 1), we want to find a configuration that minimizes both mean h-index error and mean precision error: R error h = 〈 1 − R h 〉, P error = 〈 ( 1 − P ) | K | 〉. (6).

Scientists with high interest in faculty careers had a median of two first-author and seven total peer-reviewed publications (indexed in Scopus ); the journals in which they published had an average impact factor of 5.8; and these scientists had a mean h-index of 5 (Hirsch, 2005).

Scientists in this sample with low interest in faculty careers had a median of 2.5 first-author and six total publications; the journals they published in had an average impact factor of 6.1; and these scientists had a mean h-index of 4.7.

As an example, among general surgeons in Ontario, mean (SD) h index by academic rank was lecturer 1.0 (1.8); assistant professor 2.9 (4.1); associate professor 7.3 (6.1); and full professor 23.1 (13.6) (14).