Sentence examples for mean divergence value from inspiring English sources

We therefore focused on CNSs that have at most the mean divergence value of the protein-coding genes of the most diverged species to the reference genome.

Finally, we considered the proportion of the mean divergence value of the coding regions to the nonsynonymous substitutions (see supplementary table S2, Supplementary Material online).

We also compared the mean divergence value of the coding regions with the average divergence of all gene and repeat-masked noncoding regions.

The mean divergence value of the coding regions was significantly lower than the average genomic noncoding divergence (t-test P = 0) in each lineage.

This value is similar in each lineage (∼0.06), suggesting that the mean divergence value of the coding regions is a reasonable threshold.

The mean divergence value was significantly lower than the mean value of synonymous substitutions and the genomic average (t-test P < 10−) but higher than the mean value of nonsynonymous substitutions (t-test P < 10−) in all lineages.

This trend was not observed in the distribution of interspecific K2P divergence values across all taxon combinations (Figure 1); however, comparison of mean divergence values within each genus (θ' values) by genus pair did statistically support an overall faster rate of divergence in trnH-psbA relative to rbcL (see Results).

Cg-defs present mean divergence values of 0.058 between group I and II; 0.214 between group I and III and 0.223 between group II and III, while Cg-prp present lower values of 0.063 between group I and II; 0.101 between group I and III and 0.081 between group II and III.

Thus, we expect the mean sequence divergence between northern and southern localities to be similar to mean divergence among clades.

Three loci, ITS1, trnH-psbA, and rpoB2, had a mean sequence divergence value greater than two percent while the remaining loci ranged between 0.2% and 1.55% (Tables 1, 2, Figure 2).

For example, rpoB2 had a high mean sequence divergence value (2.05%), but poor PCR success in non-angiosperms (failed in all tested gymnosperms, ferns and all but one moss); rpoC1 had better PCR success (83.3%) than rpoB2, but a lower mutation rate (1.38%).