Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.
Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
margin for error
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
"margin for error" is correct and can be used in written English.
It is usually used to refer to a limited amount of room for mistakes without incurring a serious problem or consequence. For example, "When flying a plane, there is very little margin for error."
✓ Grammatically correct
News & Media
Formal & Business
Sports
Food
General
Alternative expressions(20)
room for error
margin of failure
room for possibility
little room for error
allowance for unforeseen events
scope for flexibility
buffer for uncertainty
room for contingency
allowance for changes
provision for adjustments
flexibility for modifications
room for alterations
space for doubt
space for adjustment
room for modification
room for maneuver
opportunity for revision
air to work with
room to maneuver
opportunity to contribute
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
60 human-written examples
Small margin for error.
News & Media
"There's no margin for error".
News & Media
"Not much margin for error".
News & Media
The margin for error is tiny.
News & Media
He has little margin for error.
News & Media
There is little margin for error.
News & Media
There is very little margin for error.
News & Media
"There's no margin for error," he says.
News & Media
There's still no margin for error.
News & Media
"Our margin for error is getting smaller.
News & Media
"There is a margin for error".
News & Media
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
Use "margin for error" to set expectations in project management, clarifying the acceptable deviation from planned timelines or budgets.
Common error
Avoid using "margin for error" when referring to situations where any mistake is completely unacceptable. In such cases, stating there is "no tolerance for error" is more accurate and impactful.
Source & Trust
91%
Authority and reliability
4.6/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "margin for error" functions as a noun phrase. As Ludwig AI explains, it is used to indicate the degree of flexibility or allowance for mistakes within a specific process or activity. It commonly appears as the subject or object of a sentence, describing how much deviation is acceptable.
Frequent in
News & Media
65%
Formal & Business
15%
Science
10%
Less common in
Sports
5%
Encyclopedias
3%
Wiki
2%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
In summary, "margin for error" is a commonly used noun phrase that refers to the acceptable amount of deviation or mistakes within a process. Ludwig AI confirms the phrase's grammatical correctness and suitability for use in written English, particularly in formal and professional settings. As evidenced by the example sentences, it is frequently found in contexts related to news and media, business, and technical discussions. Related phrases include "leeway for error" and "room for mistakes". When using "margin for error", remember to clarify its scope and consider the context to ensure your message is clear and accurate.
More alternative expressions(10)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
leeway for error
Implies a permissible range of deviation from a standard or expected outcome, emphasizing the flexibility allowed.
room for mistakes
Highlights the possibility of making mistakes without critical consequences, focusing on human fallibility.
tolerance for inaccuracy
Indicates the acceptable level of deviation from perfect accuracy, emphasizing the degree of precision required.
permissible deviation
Refers to the allowed amount of variation from a set standard, focusing on the boundary of acceptability.
acceptable variance
Suggests a range within which differences are considered normal or allowable, highlighting statistical variation.
degree of latitude
Emphasizes the freedom to act or choose within certain constraints, focusing on flexibility and autonomy.
scope for imprecision
Indicates the extent to which exactness is not strictly required, focusing on the allowance for minor errors.
buffer for mistakes
Implies a safety net or reserve to absorb the impact of errors, focusing on mitigation and protection.
cushion for errors
Similar to 'buffer', suggesting a means of softening the impact of mistakes, focusing on reducing negative effects.
space for miscalculation
Highlights the potential for incorrect estimations or computations, focusing on the risk aspect.
FAQs
How can I use "margin for error" in a sentence?
You can use "margin for error" to indicate the amount of acceptable deviation in a process or task. For example, "In surgery, there is very little "margin for error"".
What can I say instead of "margin for error"?
You can use alternatives like "leeway for error", "room for mistakes", or "acceptable variance" depending on the context.
Which is correct, "margin for error" or "margin of error"?
"Margin for error" and "margin of error" are both grammatically acceptable, although ""margin for error"" is more commonly used to describe the allowance for mistakes in general contexts. "Margin of error" is more commonly used as a statistical term.
What's the difference between "margin for error" and "room for error"?
While both phrases are similar, ""margin for error"" often implies a quantified or calculated allowance for mistakes, while "room for error" suggests a more general and less defined allowance.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
91%
Authority and reliability
4.6/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested