The phrase "acceptable variance" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used in contexts such as quality control, finance, or project management to refer to a level of deviation from a standard that is considered permissible.
Example: "The project's budget allows for an acceptable variance of 10% to accommodate unforeseen expenses."
Alternatives: "permissible deviation" or "tolerable difference".
Particle size distributions and agglomerate masses of the prepared ore samples were shown to be similar within acceptable variance and provided comparable surface areas for microbial colonisation and chemical reaction.
In conventional performance-adaptive methods, control systems are designed such that the variance of the control error is less than or equal to a specified value and the variance of the differences in the control input is minimized without changing the acceptable variance value of the control error.
On the other hand, since the design objective of the present study is to reduce energy consumption, the variance of the differences in the control input is first set, and then the variance of the control error is minimized without changing the acceptable variance value of the differences in the control input.
Here are studied multiple parameters that can influence this performance: (1 the number of images used during the training of the classifier: how to determine a sufficient number of images for an efficient and reliable classification (meaning that final results have acceptable variance)?
Thus, for species with highly clustered distributions, increasing the proportion intensively surveyed and the proportion of the study area surveyed could help achieve an acceptable variance estimate.
As with factor analysis, the proportion of the variance (inertia) explained by the main dimension (axis) is calculated, and the number of retained dimensions is chosen, by the scree test, to obtain a cumulative percentage of acceptable variance [30].
The Nexus recommendation for an acceptable Robust Variance Sample QC score is less than 0.15-0.2.
A relatively small number of stakeholders and performance attributes were defined and the uncertainties associated with selected MOEs were reasonably defined; therefore, the reliability of model outputs is acceptable and no variance reduction process is necessary.
With the exception of proteins measured on the SearchLight™ platform, acceptable coefficient of variance between inter-plate measurements was <20% for all assays and analyses were performed in real-time.
Considering an average tumor diameter of 3 mm, the variation in light intensity on the tumor surface and the normal surrounding is expected to remain within the acceptable light intensity variance of ±5%.
Results obtained using kits from several manufacturers differed slightly but were well within acceptable ranges of variance.
