Ai Feedback
Exact(12)
Both total mapping rates of the two libraries were approximately 80%.
The high quality of ribosome profiling reads was evidenced by high mapping rates of cellular RPF reads in coding regions (CDSs) and 5′-UTRs as well as low mapping rates of 3′-UTRs and introns for both mock and infected experiments (Fig. S1).
Both of the mapping rates of the two libraries were almost 50%.
When mapping to the reference transcriptome, Bowtie2 obtains slightly higher mapping rates of 0.6269 to 0.7052.
Bowtie2 mapping to the reference genome (Bowtie2-G) obtains higher still mapping rates of 0.6227 to 0.6530.
The remaining unmapped sequences were further aligned to fosmid contigs (>5Kb), which resulted in the total mapping rates of 89.19%, 91.75% and 92.29%, for three datasets.
Similar(48)
This mapping rate of bisulfite sequences was significantly higher than those obtained by Illumina short read sequencing platform, which usually varies significantly between samples [30].
An average mapping rate of ~83% (164.66 million mapped reads) was reached.
This added to the NextGenMap mapped reads gives a total mapping rate of 26%.
The mapping rate of Wh3 sequencing data was 94.84% and that of Wh6 was 59.82%.
All of these data were mapped to human reference sequence and with a mean mapping rate of ~75%%.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com