Ai Feedback
Exact(6)
Manuscripts were assessed for study design, bias, pain assessment, and pain management protocol.
The manuscripts were assessed by a program committee of 350 reviewers and 191 co-reviewers.
All included manuscripts were assessed by at least one reviewer for study and reporting quality using validated tools.
All included manuscripts were assessed by at least one reviewer for study and reporting quality using validated tools [ 25- 30].
Articles published before February 2014 were retrieved and the abstracts and selected manuscripts were assessed by a single reviewer.
In addition to editorial evaluations, all manuscripts were assessed by at least two reviewers from a panel of 22 experts in the field (see Acknowledgements).
Similar(54)
As a key to quality assurance, scientific manuscripts are assessed by peers and revised accordingly before publication.
For the purposes of our analysis, therefore, the data from the two trials in this manuscript were assessed independently, resulting in the final analysis of data from six randomized controlled trials [ 16- 20].
Although the peer reviewer knows the identity of the author of the manuscript being assessed, the author doesn't know the identity of the peer reviewer.
Study design features that might affect selection of participants, detection of recurrence, and manuscript publication were assessed.
Manuscripts of investigations were assessed to determine if relevant information existed within the publication.
Related(20)
articles were assessed
statements were assessed
manuscripts were evaluated
papers were assessed
materials were assessed
reports were assessed
documents were assessed
pieces were assessed
authors were assessed
contributions were assessed
texts were assessed
documentation were assessed
manuscripts were painted
manuscripts were included
manuscripts were lost
manuscripts were identified
manuscripts were scattered
manuscripts were recycled
manuscripts were obtained
manuscripts were seized
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com