Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(60)
In total, 25 articles were assessed in full, with 6 being excluded following full assessment.
Thirty-five articles were assessed for eligibility.
Articles were assessed against predefined inclusion criteria.
The full-text articles were assessed for eligibility independently.
The remaining 130 full-text articles were assessed for eligibility.
Limitations: Retrieved articles were assessed by several of the authors.
1416 articles were assessed and 32 articles included.
After that the full texts of potentially suitable articles were assessed.
The articles were assessed for quality using the MMAT and AACODS checklist.
All articles were assessed for relevancy before inclusion into this review.
Studies were then excluded that clearly did not meet eligibility criteria and 235 articles were assessed for full-text eligibility.
More suggestions(15)
works were assessed
articles were measured
papers were assessed
reports were assessed
articles were addressed
principles were assessed
articles were examined
articles were appraised
rules were assessed
publications were assessed
articles were evaluated
section were assessed
constitution were assessed
item were assessed
manuscripts were assessed
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com