Sentence examples for papers were assessed from inspiring English sources

These full-text papers were assessed independently by the two readers (NHJC and AEG) using a pilot-tested assessment form.

Commentary papers were assessed in relation to key issues about follow-up care.

The papers were assessed based on the structure and quality of the introduction, research method, results and conclusion.

Papers were assessed based on whether they address problems of physical product flows and/or operational logistics interfaces between channels.

Papers were assessed based on their decision modeling, demand models and their relation to space and reorder planning.

Twenty-two selected papers were assessed by two independent reviewers and the majority of studies scored low risk of bias on the selected items.

All relevant papers were assessed for quality using the Quality Assessment of the Studies of Diagnostic Accuracy Included in Systematic Reviews (QUADAS) criteria [12].

More specifically the free papers were assessed for any trial or observational study that included direct interaction between an investigator and their human subjects.

Overall, the papers were assessed as being low in terms of evidential hierarchy and the quality of the papers was assessed as being on average fair.

The statistical methods and analysis of the papers were assessed to determine whether the experimental design and the statistical analysis were appropriate.

The quality of the papers was assessed using the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP) assessment tool for qualitative research.