low expenditures

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "low expenditures" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing financial matters, particularly in contexts where spending is being evaluated or compared. Example: "The company's strategy focuses on maintaining low expenditures to improve overall profitability."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

3 human-written examples

As expected, new WECS always have low expenditures on operation and maintenance; however, the operation and, especially, the maintenance costs increase as the useful life of the power plant decreases[1].

International Journal of Energy and Environmental Engineering

The very low expenditures on dental care for the elderly can be regarded as an objective system-related barrier difficult to overcome at the present stage of Poland's socioeconomic transformation.

Clinical interventions in aging

Concerning investments into ALMP, rehabilitative services and income maintenance, we observe some convergence between the three indicators within single countries or among groups of countries with similar social and labour policies (e.g. high ALMP expenditures in Scandinavian countries, low expenditures in England and the USA).

BMC Public Health

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

57 human-written examples

Despite its low expenditure on healthcare Cuba has a huge number of doctors - far more proportionately than Britain.

The Guardian - Opinion

Part of the answer to Japan's relatively low expenditure lies in its tight grip on costs.

The Guardian

The populist political mood doesn't make big spending cuts easy, though, and while it is often accused of epic profligacy, India's central government has pretty low expenditure relative to GDP about 15%.

The Economist

Models with multiple measures improved overall prediction, reduced over-prediction of low expenditure quintiles, and reduced under-prediction in the highest quintile of expenditures.

Duke University

Children in low expenditure quintiles are more likely to be under normal weight and height compared to those in high expenditure quintile [11].

Health Economics Review

Whereas for instance Japan and the United Kingdom have increased their expenditures on these measures by comparatively large amounts, Germany and the United States both exhibited relative low expenditure increases.

IZA Journal of Labor Policy

It especially supports molecular fragment structures and offers parallelizable force calculation plus efficient caching options with an interface and factory-pattern driven design for comfortable and low expenditure code extensions, customizations or replacements.

Journal of Cheminformatics

Agriculture Orientation Index (AOI) for Government Expenditures, SDG Indicator 2.a.1, was lowest for Sub-Saharan Africa, indicating low expenditure share relative to sector contribution to GDP.

Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When discussing financial performance, use "low expenditures" to highlight cost-saving strategies and efficient resource management.

Common error

While acceptable in formal settings, avoid using "low expenditures" in casual conversations. Opt for simpler terms like "cheap" or "affordable" for better clarity.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "low expenditures" functions primarily as a noun phrase, often serving as the subject or object in a sentence. It describes a state of reduced or minimized spending. Ludwig AI confirms its correct usage in various contexts.

Expression frequency: Common

Frequent in

Science

34%

News & Media

33%

Formal & Business

33%

Less common in

Wiki

0%

Reference

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "low expenditures" is a grammatically sound and commonly used term that describes reduced or minimal spending. Ludwig AI's analysis highlights its prevalence across various contexts, including science, news, and formal business settings. While versatile, it's most suitable for formal and neutral registers. For casual conversation, simpler terms might be more appropriate. Understanding the nuances of "low expenditures" enables more precise and impactful communication in financial discussions.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

Minimal spending

Focuses on the act of spending being kept to a minimum.

Reduced costs

Highlights the decrease in expenses.

Frugal spending

Emphasizes the careful and economical use of resources.

Economic outlays

Suggests a cost-effective approach to expenses.

Lean budgeting

Implies a budget with minimal waste or excess.

Cost-effective measures

Highlights actions taken to minimize costs while maintaining effectiveness.

Budgetary restraint

Emphasizes the control and limitation of spending.

Limited expenses

Focuses on the restriction of financial outlays.

Modest disbursements

Indicates small or moderate amounts of money being paid out.

Efficient resource allocation

Highlights the optimized distribution of resources to minimize waste and spending.

FAQs

How can I use "low expenditures" in a sentence?

You might say, "The company achieved higher profits by maintaining "low expenditures" across all departments".

What are some alternatives to saying "low expenditures"?

Consider using phrases like "minimal spending", "reduced costs", or "frugal spending depending on the specific context.

Is it better to say "low expenditures" or "lower costs"?

Both phrases are valid, but ""low expenditures"" is generally used when discussing the overall amount spent, while "lower costs" focuses on the reduction of specific expenses.

What's the difference between "low expenditures" and "cost-effective"?

"Low expenditures" refers to the amount of money spent, whereas "cost-effective" describes something that provides good value for the money spent. Something can have "low expenditures" without being cost-effective if it doesn't provide adequate value.