limited with

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "limited with" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it to describe a situation in which a person or group has only a certain amount of freedom, resources, or time in which to work. For example, "The team was limited with their budget for the project, so they had to be creative to maximize their resources."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Encyclopedias

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

55 human-written examples

However, templates on both are limited with a free account.

The Guardian

And at center back we're limited with depth.

The Guardian - Sport

The wine list is limited, with most bottles around $30.

The New York Times

Places are limited, with priority given to club members.

The Guardian

"I think we're very limited with our options.

The Guardian - Business

Ignitrons are very limited with respect to their physical orientation.

Encyclopedia Britannica

Access is limited, with restrictions on commercial vehicles.

Encyclopedia Britannica

Book well in advance; accommodations are limited, with 14 doubles, 6 cottages, 5 tented cottages.

The New York Times - Travel

Top speed settings can be limited, with warnings beeping at 70, 90 or 100kph.

The Guardian - Tech

The program is limited, with some exceptions, to borrowers with household incomes at or below their area's median income.

The New York Times

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

1 human-written examples

As such, the applications are pretty limited with the hardware.

TechCrunch

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "limited with", ensure the context clearly specifies what the subject is limited in relation to. Providing specific details enhances clarity and prevents ambiguity.

Common error

Avoid using "limited with" in situations where 'limited to' or 'limited by' is more appropriate. "Limited with" implies a resource or condition, while 'limited to' specifies scope and 'limited by' indicates cause.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "limited with" functions as an adjective phrase followed by a preposition. Ludwig AI confirms its grammatical correctness and usability. It typically describes a state of being restricted or constrained by a particular factor, such as resources or capabilities. Examples from Ludwig show its use in diverse contexts, such as financial limitations and physical constraints.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

35%

Science

35%

Wiki

9%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

7%

Formal & Business

5%

Social Media

4%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "limited with" is a grammatically correct and commonly used way to express constraints or restrictions, as validated by Ludwig. Its neutral register makes it suitable for various contexts, although formal settings might benefit from synonyms. The phrase sees frequent use in news, science, and general writing, indicating its broad applicability. When employing "limited with", ensure that the nature of the limitation is clearly defined to avoid ambiguity. As indicated by Ludwig AI, the phrase effectively conveys the presence of constraints affecting a situation or entity.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

constrained by

Focuses on the external force causing the limitation.

restricted by

Emphasizes a rule or condition imposing the limitation.

hampered by

Highlights the hindering effect of the limitation.

bound by

Suggests an obligation or agreement causing the limitation.

circumscribed by

Implies a defined boundary or scope causing the limitation.

confined to

Indicates that something is restricted to a specific area or range.

governed by

Highlights the influence of rules or principles on the limitation.

under the thumb of

Emphasizes control or domination leading to the limitation.

restrained by

Focuses on holding back or controlling something due to the limitation.

inhibited by

Highlights the prevention or slowing down caused by the limitation.

FAQs

How can I use "limited with" in a sentence?

You can use "limited with" to describe a situation where something or someone faces restrictions. For instance, "The project was "limited with" a tight budget", indicating the project's financial constraints.

What phrases are similar to "limited with"?

Alternatives include phrases like "constrained by", "restricted by", or "hampered by", each conveying a slightly different nuance of restriction or limitation.

Is it better to say "limited with" or "limited by"?

The choice depends on the context. "Limited with" typically refers to a resource or condition that imposes a limitation, while "limited by" usually indicates the direct cause of the limitation. Use "limited with" when the limitation arises from a specific resource or condition.

How does "limited with" compare to "limited to"?

"Limited with" describes a situation of restriction due to resources or conditions, whereas "limited to" defines the scope or range. For example, "access is "limited to" members" specifies who can access something, which is different from being "limited with" resources.