restricted by

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase 'restricted by' is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when you want to express that something is limited or confined by certain conditions. For example: My ability to focus on the task at hand was restricted by the loud music playing in the background.

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Encyclopedias

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

59 human-written examples

Speed restricted by weight.

The New Yorker

"You're restricted by SAT's.

The New York Times

You're restricted by grades.

The New York Times

You're restricted by price".

The New York Times

But he felt restricted by television.

The Guardian - Film

We're not restricted by the area.

The New York Times

Wearing jewelry was restricted by feudal protocol and tradition.

The New York Times - Arts

My record here, even restricted by injury, is good.

The Guardian - Sport

Music is no longer restricted by the format it's on.

The Guardian - Tech

Her own sleuthing was restricted by confidentiality laws.

The Guardian - Music

Or they have been restricted by political initiatives.

The Guardian - Opinion

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "restricted by", ensure the limiting factor is clearly identified to provide context and meaning for the reader.

Common error

Avoid using "restricted by" without clearly stating what is causing the restriction, as this can lead to ambiguity and confusion. Always specify the limiting agent to maintain clarity.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "restricted by" functions as a prepositional phrase, typically modifying a noun or verb to indicate a limitation or constraint. It highlights the factor causing the restriction. Ludwig AI confirms its grammatical correctness and usability.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

35%

Science

35%

Encyclopedias

8%

Less common in

Wiki

5%

Formal & Business

5%

Reference

2%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "restricted by" is a versatile prepositional phrase used to indicate a limitation or constraint imposed by a specific factor. As confirmed by Ludwig AI, it is grammatically correct and widely used across various contexts, particularly in news, scientific writing, and encyclopedias. While alternatives like "limited by" or "constrained by" exist, clarity is key: always specify the limiting factor. Remember to avoid ambiguity by clearly identifying what is causing the restriction. With a strong presence in authoritative sources like The New York Times and The Guardian, "restricted by" remains a reliable choice for expressing constraints in your writing.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

limited by

Replaces "restricted" with "limited", emphasizing the boundary or extent of the constraint.

constrained by

Uses "constrained" to highlight the force or pressure causing the restriction.

bound by

Emphasizes the obligation or duty that causes the restriction.

governed by

Suggests that the restriction comes from rules or regulations.

controlled by

Focuses on the aspect of being managed or directed by something else.

circumscribed by

Indicates that the restriction defines the boundaries or limits of something.

impeded by

Highlights the hindering or obstructive nature of the restriction.

hampered by

Similar to impeded, but emphasizes the difficulty caused by the restriction.

subject to

Indicates that something is conditional on or affected by the stated restriction.

dependent on

Highlights the reliance on something that causes the restriction.

FAQs

How can I use "restricted by" in a sentence?

The phrase "restricted by" indicates a limitation or constraint. For instance, "The project's scope was "restricted by" budget constraints" shows how budget affected the project.

What are some alternatives to "restricted by"?

Alternatives include phrases like "limited by", "constrained by", or "bound by", depending on the specific nuance you want to convey.

Is it better to use "restricted by" or "limited by"?

Both "restricted by" and "limited by" are correct and often interchangeable. The choice depends on the specific context and the desired emphasis. "Restricted" suggests a more forceful constraint, while "limited" implies a boundary or extent.

What does it mean when something is "restricted by" a certain law?

If something is "restricted by" a law, it means that the law imposes limits or regulations on that thing, activity, or behavior. For example, "Freedom of speech is "restricted by" laws against defamation".