limited in

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "limited in" is a correct and usable part of a sentence in written English.
It is generally used to indicate that something is restricted or limited to a certain amount or range. For example: "The number of courses I can take this semester is limited in order to allow me to maintain a good academic balance."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Wiki

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

56 human-written examples

"You are limited in your casting.

The New York Times

Visibility is limited in the grandstands.

The New York Times - Sports

I'm limited in many ways.

The New York Times - Travel

Formal entertainment options are limited in Pyongyang.

The Guardian

Fairfield County is limited in general".

The New York Times

Trump's voice is limited in the documents.

The New Yorker

I don't feel limited in any way.

The New Yorker

Yet the winemakers are limited in what they can accomplish.

The New York Times - Food

The new team will be limited in its choices.

The New York Times - Arts

The court is severely limited in its reach.

The Guardian

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

1 human-written examples

Coles was not limited in that game.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "limited in", ensure the context clearly specifies what is being limited and the area or aspect in which the limitation applies. Clarity prevents ambiguity.

Common error

Avoid using "limited in" without specifying what the limitation is. For instance, instead of saying "The project is limited in scope", be specific: "The project is limited in scope due to budget constraints."

Linguistic Context

The phrase "limited in" primarily functions as an adjectival phrase, modifying a noun to indicate a restriction or constraint in a specific area or aspect. This is confirmed by Ludwig, which provides numerous examples of its usage in various contexts.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

39%

Science

25%

Wiki

14%

Less common in

Formal & Business

7%

Reference

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "limited in" is a common and grammatically sound way to express that something is restricted or constrained in a particular area or aspect. Ludwig AI confirms its correctness and widespread usage across diverse sources, including News & Media, Science, and Wiki. When using this phrase, ensure to specify what the limitation is and the context in which it applies to avoid vagueness. Alternatives like "restricted by" or "constrained by" can be used to add variety to your writing, depending on the nuance you wish to convey.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

Restricted by

Focuses on the external force causing the limitation, rather than the state of being limited.

Constrained by

Emphasizes the imposition of limits or restrictions on something.

Circumscribed by

Implies clearly defined boundaries or limits.

Bounded by

Suggests limitations set by specific boundaries or parameters.

Confined to

Highlights the state of being restricted to a specific area or scope.

Subject to

Indicates being under the influence or control of certain limitations.

Inhibited by

Emphasizes the hindrance or prevention caused by limitations.

Checked by

Suggests a restraining influence or a moderating factor.

Curbed by

Implies a restraint or control over something that could otherwise be excessive.

Harnessed by

Suggests the controlled use of something, often implying limitations.

FAQs

How can I use "limited in" in a sentence?

The phrase "limited in" indicates a restriction or constraint. For example, "My knowledge is "limited in" this area", or "Resources are "limited in" supply".

What are some alternatives to saying "limited in"?

You can use alternatives such as "restricted by", "constrained by", or "confined to" depending on the specific context.

Is it correct to say "limited in" or should I use another preposition?

"Limited in" is generally correct when indicating an area or aspect of limitation. Other prepositions might be appropriate depending on the specific context, but "limited in" is a common and accepted usage.

What's the difference between ""limited in"" and "limited to"?

"Limited in" refers to the aspect or area where the limitation exists (e.g., "limited in scope"), while "limited to" specifies the extent or boundary of the limitation (e.g., "limited to 10 participants").