less accuracy for

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "less accuracy for" is correct and usable in written English.
You could use it in a sentence like, "The new version of this program has less accuracy for detecting errors."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Academia

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

6 human-written examples

We hypothesized that magnetic resonance cholangiography (MRC) may have less accuracy for the diagnosis and the assessment of the severity of primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) than endoscopic retrograde cholangiography (ERC).

Gastrointestinal Endoscopy

If new restrictions are needed, there's basically two choices: Turn SA back on and go back to the days of less accuracy for civilians, or leave it off.

Forbes

Promising results were also found for MDCTA's ability to characterise plaque's composition compared with histology, although with less accuracy for the detection of ulcers according to some authors [93].

Insights into Imaging

The use of fewer genes resulted in more accurate prediction for non-local-recurrence patients, but less accuracy for local-recurrence patients.

Breast Cancer Research

The performance accuracy of fecal tests is known to vary between significantly between manufactures and generally demonstrates less accuracy for adenomas than for CRC.

Clinical and Translational Gastroenterology

Unfortunately, standard deviation of the mean values of temperatures obtained by transponder measurements was larger compared to rectal recordings for all 3 groups, indicating less accuracy for the electronic monitoring system when used on individual animal level (table 2).

Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

54 human-written examples

There are two reasons for less accuracy of these protocols.

EURASIP Journal on Wireless Communications and Networking

In contrast, experiments show less accuracy (up to 60%) for user-independent training for all tested classification techniques.

International Journal of Human-Computer Studies

Nevertheless, measurement costs are likely to be higher for short-term assets than for long-term assets, which means we might expect less accuracy, all else equal, for short-term assets.

University of Chicago

Although their study is not intended for DIF detection, it provides evidence that there is a trade-off between choosing the complex model for a slight improvement on parameter recovery but lower efficiency and the simple model for less accuracy but higher efficiency, which is similar to the concept of "the curse of dimensionality" in cluster analysis (James et al. 2013).

Large-scale Assessments in Education

It seems that both arrays have similar ability for resolving middle angles but as expected, the ULA has less accuracy than the proposed array for the angles located in both sides of the spectrum.

EURASIP Journal on Advances in Signal Processing

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "less accuracy for", ensure the context clearly specifies what is being measured or assessed. For example, "less accuracy for predicting long-term trends" is more informative than simply "less accuracy".

Common error

Avoid using "less accuracy for" without specifying what the accuracy pertains to. Saying "the model has less accuracy for complex datasets" is better than stating "the model has less accuracy".

Linguistic Context

The phrase "less accuracy for" functions as a modifier, typically describing a method, model, or tool. It highlights a comparative deficiency in precision or correctness when applied to a specific task or context. As Ludwig examples show, it's used across scientific and general domains.

Expression frequency: Uncommon

Frequent in

Science

60%

News & Media

20%

Academia

20%

Less common in

Formal & Business

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "less accuracy for" is a grammatically correct phrase used to indicate a comparative lack of precision or correctness in a specific context. Ludwig AI confirms its validity. While not extremely common, it appears consistently in scientific, news, and academic writing. When using this phrase, it's crucial to clearly specify what the "accuracy" pertains to, avoiding overgeneralizations. Alternatives like "decreased precision for" or "lower reliability for" may be appropriate depending on the intended nuance. Ensure clarity in your writing by providing context to the accuracy being discussed.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

decreased precision for

Replaces "accuracy" with "precision", focusing on the fineness of measurement.

reduced correctness for

Substitutes "accuracy" with "correctness", highlighting the degree to which something is free from error.

lower reliability for

Replaces "accuracy" with "reliability", shifting the focus to the consistency of results.

diminished exactness for

Uses "exactness" instead of "accuracy", emphasizing the quality of being strictly accurate.

compromised trueness for

Replaces "accuracy" with "trueness", focusing on the fidelity to a standard or fact.

poorer fidelity for

Swaps "accuracy" for "fidelity", emphasizing the faithfulness of a representation or measurement.

less dependable for

Shifts from "accuracy" to "dependable", highlighting the trustworthiness of a method or result.

impaired validity for

Replaces "accuracy" with "validity", stressing the degree to which something measures what it claims to measure.

suboptimal precision for

Uses "suboptimal" to indicate that the precision is not ideal.

weakened consistency for

Substitutes "accuracy" with "consistency", focusing on the uniformity of results.

FAQs

How can I use "less accuracy for" in a sentence?

You can use "less accuracy for" to describe situations where a method, tool, or model is not as precise or reliable as desired for a specific task. For example: "This method exhibits "less accuracy for" predicting rare events."

What are some alternatives to "less accuracy for"?

Alternatives include phrases like "decreased precision for", "reduced correctness for", or "lower reliability for", depending on the specific nuance you want to convey.

Is it grammatically correct to say "less accuracy for"?

Yes, it is grammatically correct. The phrase "less accuracy for" is often used to compare the performance of different methods or tools in specific contexts. Ludwig AI confirms this.

What's the difference between "less accuracy for" and "lower accuracy for"?

While both phrases are similar, "lower accuracy for" directly implies a comparison in terms of a quantitative value. "Less accuracy for" can be used more broadly to indicate a deficiency in precision or correctness for a particular purpose.