Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

reduced correctness for

Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "reduced correctness for" is not standard in written English and may cause confusion.
It could be used in contexts discussing the diminishing accuracy or reliability of something, but it is not commonly used. Example: "The new software update has led to reduced correctness for the data analysis results."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

Science

News & Media

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

60 human-written examples

While this may reduce the correctness problem to that of a single program, it still means that we are left with the correctness problem for a large program.

Science

SEP

Reduced sentence for Bosch.

News & Media

Los Angeles Times

To reduce these risks, we propose a theory of correctness for fine-grain concurrent programs.

Relaxing the requirement of 100% correctness for devices and interconnections may dramatically reduce costs of manufacturing, verification, and testing.

Section Proof of correctness includes the proof of correctness for the masking approach in combination with wavelets.

For each recorded diagnosis in the CCR, the level of correctness was assessed as: total correctness when the recorded diagnosis in the CCR corresponded well to the information in the VCR, partial correctness when the level of correctness was less satisfactory, or absence of correctness for incorrect information present in the CCR.

Correctness for information on affected limb was 95% and varied with joint.

Logistic regression was used to examine factors associated with correctness for diagnosis.

The distribution of correctness for affected limb information is shown in table 3.

This was performed using the variable of judgment correctness for each participant.

Rather the stack is providing the correctness criteria for the implementation that is the array.

Science

SEP
Show more...

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Consider rephrasing the idea to use more common and grammatically sound expressions like "decreased accuracy", "lower reliability", or "diminished validity" for clearer communication.

Common error

Avoid using the phrase "reduced correctness for" directly. This construction is not idiomatic and may confuse readers. Opt for more established phrases to maintain clarity and professionalism.

Antonio Rotolo, PhD - Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Source & Trust

79%

Authority and reliability

2.1/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Linguistic Context

The phrase "reduced correctness for" functions to describe a state where the accuracy or validity of something has been diminished. It suggests a decline in the quality of being correct. However, Ludwig AI indicates that it is not a standard phrase in English.

Expression frequency: Missing

Frequent in

Science

0%

News & Media

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Less common in

Science

0%

News & Media

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "reduced correctness for" is not a standard or idiomatic expression in English. Ludwig AI highlights its awkwardness and suggests that it can cause confusion. While the phrase aims to convey a decline in accuracy or reliability, it is better to use more common alternatives like "decreased accuracy", "lower reliability", or "diminished validity" to ensure clarity and professionalism in writing. Given its infrequent usage and grammatical awkwardness, it is advisable to avoid this phrase in both formal and informal contexts.

More alternative expressions(6)

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

FAQs

What is a better way to say "reduced correctness for"?

Consider using alternatives like "decreased accuracy for", "lower reliability in", or "diminished validity of", depending on the specific context.

Is "reduced correctness for" grammatically correct?

While the individual words are valid, the phrase "reduced correctness for" is not a standard or idiomatic construction in English. It's best to use more common and clearer alternatives.

What does "reduced correctness for" mean?

The phrase implies that the accuracy or reliability of something has been diminished. However, due to its non-standard usage, it's better to use more explicit phrases to avoid confusion.

How can I improve the clarity of a sentence using "reduced correctness for"?

Replace "reduced correctness for" with phrases such as "decreased accuracy of", "lower precision in", or "compromised validity of" to enhance clarity and ensure better comprehension.

ChatGPT power + Grammarly precisionChatGPT power + Grammarly precision
ChatGPT + Grammarly

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Source & Trust

79%

Authority and reliability

2.1/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences: