lease at

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "lease at" is not correct in standard written English.
It seems to be a typographical error or a misphrasing, as "lease" typically refers to a rental agreement, and "at" would need to be followed by a location or context. Example: "We are looking to lease at a new location downtown."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

News & Media

Wiki

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

France's lease, at a peppercorn rent, expires in 2035.

The Economist

The Yankees' lease at Yankee Stadium expires in 2002.

The New York Times - Sports

Mr. Dicks had estimated the lease at about $17 billion.

The New York Times

Instead, it signed a three-year lease at a new theater on Jay Street.

The New York Times

The Cubs' lease at Hohokam Stadium in Mesa, for instance, does not expire until 2016.

The New York Times - Sports

I met the actual landlord to see the lease at a Denny's a few days later.

The New York Times

The Braves' move will come after their lease at Turner Field expires following the 2016 season.

The New York Times - Sports

The Vikings' lease at the Metrodome expired at the end of last season.

The New York Times - Sports

The Great Canadian Gaming Corporation's lease at the city-owned track expires in November.

The New York Times - Sports

The terms then were bad — a 40-year lease at ridiculously cheap rent.

The New York Times

A 10-year lease, at $15 a square foot, is being offered for the vacant space.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When referring to a specific location where a lease is active, consider using "lease in" or rephrasing to say "property for lease at [location]".

Common error

Avoid using "at" directly after "lease" when indicating location. Instead, clarify the sentence structure. For example, instead of "lease at this location", try "lease for this property" or "lease in this building".

Linguistic Context

The phrase "lease at" functions as a prepositional phrase, but its usage is often grammatically questionable. As Ludwig AI indicates, it's frequently a misphrasing or typographical error and requires rephrasing to adhere to standard English.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

45%

Wiki

30%

Formal & Business

10%

Less common in

Science

5%

Reference

5%

Academia

5%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, while the phrase "lease at" appears frequently, it is grammatically incorrect. Ludwig AI suggests that it is a misphrasing. While it can be found in varied contexts, especially in News & Media and Wiki sources, it is best to avoid it in formal or professional writing. Always consider alternatives like "lease for" or "lease in" or rephrase the sentence for better clarity and grammatical correctness. The key takeaway is to prioritize grammatical accuracy over common but incorrect usage.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

renting at

Replaces "lease" with "renting", emphasizing the action of renting at a specific location.

location for lease

Focuses on the property and its availability for leasing.

property for lease

Similar to "location for lease", highlighting the type of property available.

lease in

Uses "in" instead of "at", which might be grammatically more appropriate in certain contexts.

rent space at

Specifically refers to renting a space at a particular location.

sign a lease at

Emphasizes the act of signing a lease agreement at a location.

rent a property at

Highlights the act of renting a property at a certain location.

leasing opportunities at

Focuses on the availability of leasing opportunities at a specific location.

renting opportunities in

Similar to "leasing opportunities at", using "renting" and "in".

find a lease at

Conveys the action of searching for a lease at a specific location.

FAQs

How can I correct the phrase "lease at" in a sentence?

You can replace "lease at" with alternatives such as "lease for" or rewrite the sentence to clarify the location. For example, instead of "They signed a lease at the building", say "They signed a lease for the building".

Is it grammatically correct to say "lease at"?

No, "lease at" is generally considered grammatically incorrect in standard English. It's better to use constructions like "lease for" or "lease in" depending on the context.

What are some alternatives to "lease at" when describing a property?

When describing a property, you can use phrases like "property for lease", "available for lease", or "leasing opportunities".

How does the preposition change the meaning when talking about leases?

Using different prepositions changes the meaning. "Lease for" typically specifies the item or property being leased. "Lease in" refers to the location or building where the lease is active. Avoid using "lease at", as it's grammatically unsound.