known with

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "known with" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use this phrase when you want to emphasize that something is associated with someone or something else. For example: She is well known with her unique style of cooking.

✓ Grammatically correct

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

60 human-written examples

Two subtypes are known: CB1 and CB2.

Nature

(25) As is well known, (sintauomega=pmsqrt{1-cos^{2}tauomega }).

Advances in Difference Equations

This effect is already known [14].

Annals of Intensive Care

If the event is known Si,k=1.

Security Informatics

The following lemma is well known [22].

Journal of Inequalities and Applications

Many 1D weakly bonded solids are now known [14, 15].

Nanoscale Research Letters

An overdate is known, 1887/6.

Wikipedia

Two genes are known: eRF3a/GSPT1 and eRF3b/GSPT2 [20].

Plosone

We know 714.

The New York Times

He is, you know, 23.

The New York Times - Sports

"I knew 60, and I knew 61.

The New York Times - Magazine

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "known with", ensure the association is clear and direct, avoiding ambiguity about what is being connected.

Common error

Avoid using "known with" when a more precise phrase like "associated with" or "recognized for" would better convey the intended meaning.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "known with" functions as an adjectival phrase modifying a noun, indicating an association or characteristic. Ludwig AI confirms its grammatical correctness, though it is not a frequently used phrase.

Expression frequency: Missing

Frequent in

Science

0%

News & Media

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Less common in

Science

0%

News & Media

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, while grammatically correct, the phrase "known with" is relatively uncommon in modern English. Ludwig AI analysis confirms its validity, but it's important to consider that more specific alternatives like "associated with" or "recognized for" often provide greater clarity and impact. When opting for "known with", ensure the connection between the subject and its attribute is direct and unambiguous. Its neutral register and potential for awkwardness due to low frequency, suggest that it can be carefully used in writing.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

associated with

This alternative directly replaces "known with" with a synonym emphasizing a relationship or connection.

recognized for

Changes the focus to acknowledgement and reputation, implying a broader public awareness.

identified by

Shifts the emphasis to a process of identification, suggesting a specific attribute or characteristic.

familiar with

Indicates a level of acquaintance or expertise, altering the context from association to understanding.

linked to

Highlights a connection or relationship, often used in a causal or correlative sense.

characterized by

Focuses on the distinctive features or qualities that define something.

regarded as

Implies a specific opinion or judgment about someone or something.

noted for

Similar to "recognized for" but can also imply a specific achievement or quality.

defined by

Suggests that something is intrinsic to the nature or essence of the subject.

in connection with

More formal and explicitly denotes an association or relationship.

FAQs

How can I use "known with" in a sentence?

While less common, "known with" can be used to indicate an association. For example, "She is known with her dedication to the community" suggests her dedication is a defining characteristic.

What are some alternatives to "known with"?

Consider using phrases like "associated with", "recognized for", or "identified by" for greater clarity and impact.

Is it better to say "known for" or "known with"?

"Known for" is generally preferred as it directly indicates the reason for someone's fame or recognition. "Known with" can be used, but its uncommonness may sound awkward.

What does it mean when something is "known with" a specific quality?

It suggests that the quality is strongly associated or connected with the subject, although this usage is not as common as saying something is "known for" a quality.