it was recovered

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "it was recovered" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when referring to something that has been found or retrieved after being lost or misplaced. Example: "After a thorough search, it was recovered from the depths of the ocean."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Encyclopedias

Wiki

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

It was recovered intact.

The New York Times

He fumble again, and it was recovered by New Orleans.

The New York Times - Sports

It was recovered later at Justice Avenue and Broadway.

The New York Times

It was recovered at the Saints' 25 by Steve Martin.

The New York Times - Sports

It was recovered at a depth of 14,000 feet.

The New York Times

It was recovered and sent for lab testing.

The New York Times

"It was recovered in a bag of stolen items".

The New York Times

It was recovered by the Geissbühlers, who found everything intact.

The New York Times - Science

It was recovered only blocks from where it was stolen.

The New York Times

It was recovered by the Pats, and led to their first touchdown of the game.

Massachusetts Institute of Technology

Neither Mr. Forster nor the F.B.I. would say how it was recovered.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "it was recovered" when you want to emphasize that something lost, stolen, or damaged has been found and brought back to its original state or owner.

Common error

While "it was recovered" is grammatically sound, overuse of the passive voice can make your writing sound weak. Ensure the context benefits from emphasizing the object rather than the actor. If the actor is important, consider rewriting in the active voice, e.g., "The police recovered it."

Linguistic Context

The phrase "it was recovered" functions as a passive construction, indicating that an object or entity has been found or retrieved after being lost, stolen, or misplaced. According to Ludwig AI, this phrase is grammatically correct and widely used.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

45%

Science

20%

Encyclopedias

15%

Less common in

Wiki

10%

Formal & Business

5%

Reference

5%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "it was recovered" is a grammatically correct and frequently used passive construction that indicates an item has been successfully retrieved. As Ludwig AI confirms, it's suitable for various contexts, from news reports to scientific articles. The phrase emphasizes the object being retrieved rather than the actor performing the recovery. While generally neutral in register, it's important to consider the potential for overuse of the passive voice and ensure clarity in your writing.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

it was retrieved

Emphasizes the act of finding and bringing something back.

it was found

A simpler and more general way of saying something was located.

it was regained

Focuses on the idea of getting something back after losing it.

it was located

Similar to "it was found" but implies a more specific search.

it was reclaimed

Suggests taking something back that was previously lost or abandoned.

it was restored

Highlights the return to a previous condition or state.

it was reacquired

Implies that something was obtained again after a period of not having it.

it was salvaged

Focuses on rescuing something from damage or loss.

it was discovered

Emphasizes the act of finding something previously unknown.

it was secured

Highlights the act of making something safe and protected after recovery.

FAQs

How can I use "it was recovered" in a sentence?

You can use "it was recovered" to describe an object or item that has been found after being lost or stolen. For example, "The painting stolen from the museum "it was recovered" a week later."

What are some alternatives to saying "it was recovered"?

Alternatives include "it was retrieved", "it was found", or "it was reclaimed", depending on the specific context.

Is it better to use active or passive voice when saying something was recovered?

It depends on the context. If you want to emphasize the object that was recovered, passive voice ("it was recovered") is appropriate. If you want to emphasize who recovered it, active voice (e.g., "The police recovered it") is better.

What's the difference between "it was recovered" and "it was restored"?

""it was recovered"" implies finding something that was lost or stolen. "it was restored" means something was returned to its original condition after being damaged.