it was reclaimed

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "it was reclaimed" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when referring to something that has been taken back or restored, often in the context of land, resources, or property. Example: "After years of neglect, the abandoned park was reclaimed by the community and transformed into a vibrant green space."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Encyclopedias

Wiki

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

14 human-written examples

And with the help of friendly passers-by, who in Scandinavia all seemed to speak English, we managed a public bus to the Vasa Museum in Stockholm to see a 17th-century warship that inexplicably sank soon after its launching; it was reclaimed from the mud in 1961.

The New York Times - Travel

David Malcolm explained that it was "reclaimed" land.

The New Yorker

Abandoned in 1524 because of disease and Moorish hostility, it was reclaimed following a Spanish-Moroccan treaty in 1860.

Britannica

Heralded by online insiders, it was reclaimed by Apache Software who refined it for use among a more selective audience.

The Guardian

It briefly was a Spanish possession in 1762, when France ceded its territory east of the Mississippi River to Spain, but the next year it went to England by the Treaty of Paris; in 1780 it was reclaimed by Spain.

Encyclopedia Britannica

Laroche said it was rented to a family of solicitors until it was reclaimed in the 1950s by Bridoux's granddaughter, whose husband, Daniel Fabre, still lives in the house.

The Guardian

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

46 human-written examples

On Thursday, in an effort to regain some of its lost credibility, a government panel reviewing coal concessions announced that it was reclaiming four coal fields from companies that had not made sufficient progress in mining.

The New York Times

So when our European allies reacted negatively to the phrase "axis of evil," the Bush White House may well have felt that it was reclaiming the Reagan legacy.

The New York Times

Freedom is relinquished more easily than it is reclaimed.

The New York Times

After all, it is reclaimed from pure, discomforting grimness by the evidence that the author survived his childhood to write about it with such cleansing vengeance (2 00).

The New York Times

After all, it is reclaimed from pure, discomforting grimness by the evidence that the author survived his childhood to write about it with such cleansing vengeance.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "it was reclaimed" to clearly indicate that something previously lost or taken away has been successfully recovered or restored. This construction is particularly useful in historical, environmental, or legal contexts.

Common error

Avoid using "it was reclaimed" when the active agent is known and relevant. Overusing the passive voice can make your writing sound vague or evasive; consider rephrasing in the active voice for clarity and impact.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "it was reclaimed" functions as a passive construction, where the subject receives the action. According to Ludwig AI, this structure indicates that something has been recovered or restored. As evidenced by several Ludwig examples, its function often centers on narrating past events where the subject's restoration is the key information.

Expression frequency: Common

Frequent in

News & Media

40%

Encyclopedias

20%

Wiki

20%

Less common in

Academia

5%

Science

5%

Formal & Business

5%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "it was reclaimed" is a passive construction used to express that something has been successfully recovered or restored. As indicated by Ludwig AI, its grammatical status is correct, and it commonly appears in news, encyclopedia, and wiki contexts. While versatile, it's important to be mindful of the active agent and avoid overusing the passive voice. Consider alternatives like "it was recovered" or "it was restored" for nuanced meanings.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

it was recovered

Focuses on the act of finding something lost or stolen.

it was restored

Emphasizes the act of returning something to its original condition.

it was regained

Highlights the act of getting something back after losing it.

it was retrieved

Suggests the act of finding and bringing something back.

it was recaptured

Implies taking something back by force or effort.

it was acquired

Focuses on obtaining ownership or control of something.

it was reconstituted

Indicates that something was formed again.

it was regenerated

Highlights the act of renewing something.

it was reinstated

Emphasizes restoring someone or something to a previous position.

it was retaken

Suggests regaining possession or control after a loss.

FAQs

How can I use "it was reclaimed" in a sentence?

Use "it was reclaimed" to describe a situation where something has been successfully recovered or restored to its former condition. For example: "After years of neglect, the land /s/it+was+reclaimed/ by the community."

What are some alternatives to "it was reclaimed"?

You can use alternatives like "it was recovered", "it was restored", or "it was regained" depending on the specific context and nuance you want to convey.

What's the difference between "it was reclaimed" and "it was restored"?

"It was reclaimed" often implies that something was taken away or lost and then recovered, whereas "it was restored" suggests returning something to its original condition, regardless of whether it was lost or taken.

Is it better to use active or passive voice with "reclaimed"?

While both active and passive voices are grammatically correct, the best choice depends on the context. Use the active voice when you want to emphasize the actor (e.g., "The community reclaimed the land"). Use the passive voice ("it was reclaimed") when the action is more important than the actor or when the actor is unknown or irrelevant.