it was flagrant

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "it was flagrant" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it to describe an action or behavior that is conspicuously bad or offensive, often in a legal or moral context. Example: "The referee's decision to overlook the foul was flagrant and sparked outrage among the fans."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

3 human-written examples

I think it was the fact that how high his elbow was, it was flagrant".

The New York Times - Sports

The referees didn't throw a flag on the hit, even though it was flagrant and the Steelers' helmets were painted like bright yellow warheads.

The New York Times

Rondo delivered a hard foul, although Bulls fans would argue it was flagrant, across Brad Miller's face in Game 5; he threw Kirk Hinrich into the scorer's table early in Game 6.

The New York Times - Sports

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

54 human-written examples

It is flagrant breach of international human rights law".

Independent

Despite the greater media spotlight on personal matters and indiscretions, the issue seems to really burn only when it's flagrant and contemporary, or involves hypocrisy or a criminal act.

The New York Times

It's flagrant and thinly veiled".

Huffington Post

We should do like the upstanding student leaders at the University of Ottawa who demanded yoga be brought down for it's flagrant recreation of cultural genocide; we need to decolonize our yoga practice.

Huffington Post

Here was flagrant religious intolerance, in the depiction of an event intended to protest such intolerance.

The New Yorker

As a freshman at Princeton, his highest accomplishment was "flagrant neglect".

The New Yorker

Opposition and civil-rights groups insisted that the theft was flagrant.

The Economist

It was just flagrant disregard.

The New York Times - Magazine

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "it was flagrant" to describe actions or behaviors that are openly and shockingly bad, especially when emphasizing a violation of rules or standards.

Common error

Avoid using "it was flagrant" in overly informal or casual situations. The phrase carries a level of formality and severity that might be inappropriate for everyday conversation. Consider alternatives like "it was obvious" or "it was clear" in such cases.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "it was flagrant" functions as a declarative statement, expressing an observation or judgment about a situation or action. It asserts that something was conspicuously offensive or a clear violation. Ludwig AI validates this usage.

Expression frequency: Uncommon

Frequent in

News & Media

100%

Less common in

Formal & Business

0%

Science

0%

Academia

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "it was flagrant" is a phrase used to describe something conspicuously bad or offensive. Ludwig AI confirms that the phrase is valid, although its frequency is uncommon. It's most often found in news and media contexts, used to express disapproval of an action or situation. Consider alternatives like "it was blatant" or "it was egregious" depending on the desired nuance and level of formality.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

it was blatant

Focuses on the obvious and unconcealed nature of the action or situation.

it was egregious

Emphasizes the shocking and appalling nature of the situation.

it was conspicuous

Highlights how easily the action or situation was noticed.

it was evident

Stresses the clear and apparent quality of the action.

it was manifest

Implies that the action or situation was unmistakably obvious.

it was noticeable

Highlights the ease with which something was able to be perceived.

it was outrageous

Focuses on the shocking and unacceptable nature of the action.

it was scandalous

Emphasizes the disreputable and shocking nature of the situation.

it was severe

Highlights the intensity and seriousness of the action or situation.

it was striking

Emphasizes how remarkable or impressive the action was.

FAQs

How to use "it was flagrant" in a sentence?

Use "it was flagrant" to describe an action or behavior that is conspicuously offensive or violates a standard. For instance, "The disregard for safety regulations "it was flagrant" and put many at risk."

What can I say instead of "it was flagrant"?

You can use alternatives like "it was blatant", "it was egregious", or "it was obvious" depending on the specific nuance you want to convey.

Which is correct, "it was flagrant" or "it was a flagrant"?

"It was flagrant" is typically used to describe a situation or action directly. "It was a flagrant" requires a noun following it, such as "It was a flagrant violation".

What's the difference between "it was flagrant" and "it was obvious"?

"It was flagrant" implies a shocking or offensive quality to something that is obvious, whereas "it was obvious" simply means something was easily noticed or understood without necessarily being offensive.