it was blatant

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "it was blatant" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it to describe something that is very obvious or conspicuous, often in a negative context. Example: "The dishonesty in his statement was so clear that it was blatant to everyone in the room."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

20 human-written examples

To me, it was blatant discrimination".

Independent

It was blatant ideological favouritism.

The Guardian - Opinion

Frankly it was blatant cronyism," he said.

The Guardian

It was blatant and the Everton captain was booked for it.

The Guardian - Sport

You only have to read Coulson's column in Bizarre... it was blatant and obvious.

The Guardian

"But it was blatant unfair play and was shown all over the world.

The New York Times

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

40 human-written examples

Simple observation suggests that the interpersonal self is as complicated in its detailed mechanics as it is blatant about its presence.

Consciousness and Cognition

"I think it's blatant.

The New York Times

"It's blatant.

The Guardian - Sport

"It's blatant protectionism," fumes one foreigner.

The Economist

It's blatant theft," adds Benn.

The Guardian - Money

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "it was blatant" to emphasize the obvious and often negative nature of a situation or action. It adds a strong tone, so ensure it aligns with your intended message.

Common error

Avoid using "it was blatant" excessively in formal or academic writing, where a more nuanced or objective tone is often preferred. Consider alternatives like "it was evident" or "it was clear" for a less assertive approach.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "it was blatant" functions as a declarative statement, expressing a judgment about the obviousness of something. Ludwig AI confirms its correctness. Examples show it describing acts of discrimination, unfair play, or obvious errors.

Expression frequency: Common

Frequent in

News & Media

60%

Science

20%

Formal & Business

10%

Less common in

Academia

5%

Encyclopedias

3%

Wiki

2%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "it was blatant" is a grammatically sound and commonly used expression to emphasize the obviousness of something, often with a negative undertone. Ludwig AI confirms that the phrase is correct and usable in written English. While predominantly found in news and media, its usage spans across various contexts, though it may be less suitable for highly formal or academic settings. When a less assertive tone is desired, alternatives such as "it was obvious" or "it was clear" can be considered. However, when you want to call something to attention in an unmistakable way, "it was blatant" is the way to go.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

it was obvious

This alternative directly replaces 'blatant' with 'obvious', maintaining the same meaning of something being easily perceived.

it was clear

This alternative uses 'clear' instead of 'blatant', suggesting something is easily understood or evident.

it was evident

This alternative replaces 'blatant' with 'evident', indicating something is easily seen or proven.

it was plain

This alternative uses 'plain' instead of 'blatant', suggesting something is straightforward and easily understood.

it was manifest

This alternative replaces 'blatant' with 'manifest', suggesting something is clear or obvious to the eye or mind.

it was conspicuous

This alternative swaps 'blatant' for 'conspicuous', implying something is very noticeable or attracting attention.

it was flagrant

This alternative uses 'flagrant' instead of 'blatant', emphasizing the scandalous or outrageous nature of something.

it was unmistakable

This alternative replaces 'blatant' with 'unmistakable', meaning something cannot be mistaken for anything else, emphasizing its clarity.

it was palpable

This alternative uses 'palpable' instead of 'blatant', suggesting something is so intense it can almost be physically felt.

it was glaring

This alternative replaces 'blatant' with 'glaring', meaning something is extremely obvious or conspicuous, often in a negative way.

FAQs

How can I use "it was blatant" in a sentence?

You can use "it was blatant" to describe something very obvious or conspicuous, often in a negative way. For example, "It was blatant that he was lying."

What can I say instead of "it was blatant"?

You can use alternatives like "it was obvious", "it was clear", or "it was evident" depending on the specific context.

What's the difference between "it was blatant" and "it was obvious"?

"It was blatant" often implies a stronger, more negative connotation than "it was obvious". "Blatant" suggests something is not only obvious but also done without any attempt at concealment, possibly in an offensive way.

Is "it was blatant" suitable for formal writing?

While grammatically correct, "it was blatant" might be considered too informal or assertive for some formal contexts. Alternatives like "it was clear" or "it was evident" may be more appropriate.