is without evidence

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "is without evidence" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to indicate that a claim or assertion lacks supporting proof or documentation. Example: "The accusation made against the individual is without evidence, making it difficult to take any action."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

Academia

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

4 human-written examples

The record is without evidence that they engaged, or intended to engage in any other activities in Nebraska, or that anything other than the practice of their profession was the object of their return.

Cornell University

From a skeptical point of view, which does not acknowledge divine revelation, this Thomist conception amounts to faith belief that is without evidence or that is stronger than the evidence warrants, the gap being filled by the believer's own will to believe.

Britannica

The half-brain of a clinically well-categorized individual, which is without evidence of autolysis, will be extensively dissected.

Acta Neuropathologica

Five years following resection of the metastatic breast lesion, the patient is without evidence of disease and has a good quality of life.

BMC Cancer

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

56 human-written examples

No, but do not attack it for being without evidence; it is a pointless discussion.

The Guardian - Opinion

All live-born infants were without evidence of neurologic abnormalities at the time of discharge.

American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology

They may be challenged for other reasons when they are without evidence supporting them, and are merely arbitrary edicts.

Cornell University

They are now off them, and their eyes are without evidence of inflammation or tissue rejection, Lanza said.

The Washington Post

Their barrister, Jude Bunting, argued that the University's claim over the detrimental financial impact of the occupation, was without evidence.

Independent

Unless Mr Wieseltier has done some reporting from inside Mr Silver's soul (would that count as deep-dive reporting?), his claims are without evidence.

The Economist

With the selective application of multiple endoscopic excisions, radiation therapy, and more invasive operation, 100% of patients are without evidence of disease with a laryngeal preservation rate of 96%.

Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using the phrase "is without evidence", ensure you're not just dismissing an idea, but highlighting the absence of verifiable support. This strengthens your argument by pointing out a lack of foundation rather than simply disagreeing.

Common error

Avoid using "is without evidence" as a conversation ender. Instead, use it as an invitation for further investigation. If a claim lacks evidence, explain why this absence matters in the specific context.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "is without evidence" primarily functions as a descriptor, indicating a lack of supporting information for a statement or claim. It acts to qualify the assertion, highlighting the absence of proof. Ludwig confirms this, providing examples where the phrase is used to point out unsupported claims.

Expression frequency: Rare

Frequent in

Science

30%

News & Media

25%

Academia

25%

Less common in

Formal & Business

10%

Encyclopedias

5%

Wiki

5%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "is without evidence" serves to indicate the absence of support for a claim or statement. Ludwig AI validates this, demonstrating its usage across diverse contexts, including science, academia, and news media. While grammatically correct and useful, its usage is relatively rare. Alternatives such as "lacks substantiation" or "is unsupported" offer similar meanings. When employing this phrase, it's crucial to focus on the lack of verifiable support rather than simply dismissing an idea. Avoid using it as a conversation stopper; instead, encourage further investigation to understand the basis, if any, of the initial claim. Overall, the phrase fulfills an important role in critical discourse, highlighting the need for evidence-based reasoning.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

lacks substantiation

Indicates a lack of concrete support or proof, emphasizing the absence of backing for a claim.

is unsupported

Highlights the absence of evidence or backing for a statement or claim.

is unsubstantiated

Similar to "lacks substantiation", stressing the lack of evidence to support a claim.

is groundless

Suggests that the claim has no factual basis or foundation.

is unproven

Implies that the claim has not been demonstrated to be true or valid.

is not corroborated

Indicates that the information hasn't been confirmed or supported by additional sources.

is merely asserted

Suggests a claim is stated without any attempt to furnish proof or justification.

has no basis

Emphasizes that the claim or statement is not founded on any facts or evidence.

is speculative

Highlights the hypothetical and conjectural nature of the statement.

is conjecture

Implies that the statement is based on guesswork rather than concrete facts.

FAQs

How can I use "is without evidence" in a sentence?

You can use "is without evidence" to indicate that a claim or argument lacks supporting proof. For example: "The accusation made against the individual "is without evidence", making it difficult to take any action."

What are some alternatives to "is without evidence"?

Alternatives include phrases like "lacks substantiation", "is unsupported", or "is groundless". The best choice depends on the specific nuance you want to convey.

When is it appropriate to use the phrase "is without evidence"?

It's appropriate to use "is without evidence" when you want to highlight that a statement or claim is not supported by facts, data, or other verifiable information. Use it in contexts where evidence is expected or required.

Is it better to say "is without evidence" or "lacks evidence"?

Both "is without evidence" and "lacks evidence" are grammatically correct and convey a similar meaning. "Lacks evidence" might be slightly more direct, while "is without evidence" can sound more formal. The choice often depends on the overall tone and style of your writing.