is unsupported

USAGE SUMMARY

"is unsupported" is a correct and usable phrase in written English.
You can use it to describe something that is not backed up by evidence or facts, for example: "Her argument is unsupported by any data."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

58 human-written examples

It is unsupported by the facts.

The New Yorker

But this is unsupported by the facts.

The Guardian - Opinion

But Medicare says the $2.8 billion figure is unsupported.

The New York Times

This assertion is unsupported by any data or reputable study.

The Economist

This action too is unsupported by Qur'anic tradition and contravenes international agreements.

The Guardian - Opinion

The efficacy of the method, needless to say, is unsupported by modern scientific research.

The Guardian - Lifestyle

It said the verdict is unsupported by the law or facts, and it may appeal.

The New York Times - Tech

This policy is unsupported by available science and opposed by leading experts in adolescent health.

The New York Times

The notion that our cops are trigger-happy or out of control is unsupported by facts or statistics.

The New York Times

"The source of our crime problem is unsupported, unwanted children," the Republican governor, Kirk Fordice, told The Economist.

The Economist

Executives at El Paso, which is based in Houston, said the ruling "is unsupported by the evidence and is inconsistent with FERC policy".

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "is unsupported", ensure you clarify what specific evidence or support is lacking to avoid ambiguity.

Common error

Avoid using "is unsupported" as a definitive dismissal without providing context. Instead, acknowledge the absence of current support while allowing for future possibilities.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "is unsupported" functions as a predicate adjective, describing a subject that lacks necessary support or validation. It often appears in formal writing to express that a claim, theory, or system is not adequately backed by evidence, similar to the Ludwig examples.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

32%

News & Media

47%

Encyclopedias

3%

Less common in

Wiki

5%

Formal & Business

11%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "is unsupported" is a grammatically sound and frequently used phrase that serves to indicate a lack of evidence or backing for a particular claim or concept. As Ludwig AI confirms, it's a valid expression in English. Its prevalence in News & Media and Science highlights its utility in formal contexts where objective assessment is crucial. When employing this phrase, clarity is key: specify what kind of support is lacking to strengthen your critique and maintain a balanced perspective. While alternatives such as "is lacking evidence" or "is without foundation" exist, "is unsupported" remains a straightforward and widely accepted option.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

is without foundation

Emphasizes the lack of a solid base or reason for a claim or idea.

is lacking evidence

Directly points out the absence of proof or supporting information.

is not substantiated

Highlights that something hasn't been confirmed or proven true.

is not corroborated

Indicates the absence of confirmation from an independent source.

is not backed up

Suggests the absence of support, whether factual or material.

is not validated

Focuses on the lack of formal verification or approval.

is not upheld

Indicates a failure to maintain or defend something.

is not assisted

Highlights the absence of help or support.

is not defended

Implies a lack of protection or advocacy.

is without assistance

Similar to "is not assisted" but may emphasize a broader lack of aid.

FAQs

How can I use "is unsupported" in a sentence?

You can use "is unsupported" to indicate that a claim, theory, or system lacks sufficient evidence or backing. For example, "The hypothesis is unsupported by the current data."

What can I say instead of "is unsupported"?

You can use alternatives like "is without foundation", "is lacking evidence", or "is not substantiated" depending on the specific context.

Which is correct, "is unsupported" or "is not supported"?

Both "is unsupported" and "is not supported" are grammatically correct and can be used interchangeably in many contexts. "Is unsupported" is a bit more concise, while "is not supported" is slightly more explicit.

What's the difference between "is unsupported" and "is unproven"?

"Is unsupported" suggests a lack of current evidence or backing, whereas "is unproven" implies that something has not yet been established as true, but might be provable in the future. Therefore, “is unsupported��� means there's no backing right now, and “is unproven” means it hasn't been proven, but it's not to say there is no support.