is without backing

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "is without backing" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to indicate that something lacks support, justification, or evidence. Example: "The argument presented in the debate is without backing, making it difficult to take seriously."

✓ Grammatically correct

Wiki

News & Media

Science

Formal & Business

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

60 human-written examples

Big statements about where you believe things are headed are meaningless without backing them up and they tend to worry people that the stars are in your eyes.

WikiHow

At the bottom, I came upon the other item no self-respecting actor was without back then: a crumpled packet of condoms.

The Guardian

Salford will also be without back-rower Weller Hauraki for four matches after he was found guilty of two offences.

BBC

The Springboks are without back row Warren Whiteley and prop Jannie du Plessis, who have calf and hamstring injuries respectively.

BBC

The Rodney Parade side are already expected to be without back-row colleague Dan Lydiate at the start of the season as the blind-side flanker will undergo surgery in an attempt to solve a persistent ankle problem.

BBC

A sell-out crowd of 10,000 is expected at the venue on the outskirts of Dublin to watch an Irish side who will be without back injury victim Alex Cusack.

BBC

But despite Wales being without back-rower Ryan Jones for the Argentina match and the absences through injury of tight-head prop Adam Jones and flanker Dan Lydiate, Davies believes Wales have the players to succeed.

BBC

Worcester Warriors will be without back-row Leonardo Senatore for the rest of the season and winger Dean Hammond for at least a month through injury, as they fight for Premiership survival.

BBC

You can still be polite without backing down.

Forbes

"A cut in US rates in the September FOMC meeting is without doubt back on the cards".

The Guardian - Business

To be shown as is, without holding back.

Huffington Post

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "is without backing", ensure you clearly articulate what specific support or evidence is lacking to strengthen your statement.

Common error

Avoid using "is without backing" as a blanket statement without specifying the type of support needed or expected. Providing context enhances clarity and credibility.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "is without backing" functions as a predicate adjective, describing a noun or idea that lacks support, justification, or evidence. As confirmed by Ludwig AI, it is grammatically correct and usable. Examples show it used in various contexts to express a deficiency in evidence.

Expression frequency: Rare

Frequent in

News & Media

30%

Formal & Business

25%

Science

20%

Less common in

Wiki

15%

Encyclopedias

5%

Social Media

5%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "is without backing" serves to indicate a lack of support or justification for a given claim or idea. Ludwig AI confirms its grammatical correctness. While relatively rare, it is found across various contexts, including news media, formal business settings, and scientific publications. The phrase aims to express doubt about the validity or credibility of a statement. Consider using synonyms like "lacks support" or "has no foundation" for conciseness. When employing this phrase, articulate exactly what kind of support is lacking to make your statement more effective.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

lacks support

This alternative directly replaces the original phrase, emphasizing the absence of supporting evidence.

has no foundation

This option highlights the lack of a solid base or rationale.

is unsupported

A more concise way to express the absence of backing or validation.

is unfounded

This phrase suggests that the claim or idea has no basis in fact or reality.

is groundless

This option conveys the idea that there are no valid reasons or evidence to support the claim.

is not substantiated

This alternative indicates a failure to provide sufficient proof or verification.

is not justified

This highlights that the action, claim, or belief isn't warranted or defended adequately.

is not validated

This term emphasizes the lack of confirmation or approval.

is not corroborated

This suggests that the statement or information hasn't been confirmed by independent sources.

is unconfirmed

This phrase indicates that the information is not yet verified or established as true.

FAQs

How can I use "is without backing" in a sentence?

You can use "is without backing" to describe arguments or claims that lack evidence or justification. For example: "The claim that the new policy will improve efficiency "is without backing".".

What are some alternatives to "is without backing"?

Some alternatives include "lacks support", "has no foundation", or "is unsupported" depending on the context.

Is it better to say "is without backing" or "lacks backing"?

Both phrases are acceptable, but "lacks backing" is more concise and common. The choice depends on the desired level of formality and emphasis.

What's the difference between "is without backing" and "is unsubstantiated"?

"Is without backing" generally means lacking any form of support, while "is unsubstantiated" specifically implies a lack of evidence to prove something. They are similar, but "is unsubstantiated" focuses on the absence of proof.