is restricted to

USAGE SUMMARY

'is restricted to' is correct and usable in written English.
You can use this phrase to refer to a limit on something, especially if the limit is only valid in certain circumstances. For example, "Access to the museum is restricted to visitors with advanced booking."

✓ Grammatically correct

Academia

News & Media

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Political speech is restricted to candidates.

The New York Times

FamilyLeaf is restricted to family members.

The New York Times

Smoking is restricted to the patios.

The New York Times - Magazine

Their relationship is restricted to her bedroom.

The New York Times - Books

Recombination is restricted to supporting cells.

Nature

This identifier is restricted to alphanumeric characters.

Cornell University

This course is restricted to Philosophy majors.

University of California, Berkeley

This class is restricted to Philosophy majors.

University of California, Berkeley

The course is restricted to Philosophy majors.

University of California, Berkeley

Not that the Krays industry is restricted to London.

The Guardian

(The resort is restricted to guests 18 and over).

The New York Times - Travel

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "is restricted to", ensure that the limitation or restriction is clearly defined. For example, instead of saying "Access is restricted", specify "Access is restricted to registered users".

Common error

Avoid ambiguity by explicitly stating what is being limited and to whom or what it applies. For instance, clarify if "Parking is restricted" by adding "Parking is restricted to residents only".

Linguistic Context

The phrase "is restricted to" functions as a passive construction indicating a limitation or confinement. This means that something's access, usage, or scope is limited to a specific set of conditions, people, or things. Ludwig provides numerous examples illustrating this usage.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Academia

30%

News & Media

30%

Science

25%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

8%

Wiki

5%

Formal & Business

2%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "is restricted to" is a grammatically correct and commonly used expression to denote a limitation or confinement. As Ludwig AI confirms, it is suitable for various contexts, ranging from academic and scientific writing to news reporting and general communication. The phrase appears frequently in authoritative sources like The New York Times and academic institutions, confirming its reliability. When using "is restricted to", clarity is key; make sure to define the scope of the restriction explicitly to avoid ambiguity. Alternatives like "is limited to" and "is confined to" can be used depending on the specific nuance you wish to convey.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

is limited to

Direct synonym, focusing on setting a maximum bound.

is confined to

Emphasizes physical or conceptual containment.

is subject to

Highlights being under the control of a condition or rule.

is exclusive to

Indicates sole access or applicability.

is only available to

Specifies conditions for availability.

is reserved for

Focuses on setting something aside for a specific purpose or group.

is designated for

Highlights formal assignment to a purpose or group.

is earmarked for

Implies funds or resources specifically allocated.

is tailored to

Emphasizes adaptation or customization for a particular use.

is specific to

Highlights relevance or applicability to a particular instance.

FAQs

How can I use "is restricted to" in a sentence?

Use "is restricted to" to indicate a limitation or confinement. For example, "This area "is restricted to" authorized personnel only".

What are some alternatives to "is restricted to"?

You can use alternatives such as "is limited to", "is confined to", or "is subject to depending on the context.

Is it better to use "is restricted to" or "is limited to"?

Both ""is restricted to"" and "is limited to" are correct and often interchangeable. "Is restricted to" implies a formal or enforced limitation, while "is limited to" simply states a maximum extent.

Can "is restricted to" be used in both formal and informal writing?

Yes, ""is restricted to"" is appropriate for both formal and informal writing. However, in very informal contexts, you might choose a simpler phrase like "only for".