is not identified

USAGE SUMMARY

'is not identified' is a correct and usable phrase in written English.
You can use it when you have knowledge of something that is unknown or unspecified. For example, "The perpetrator of the crime is not identified."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Academia

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Damping is not identified.

Journal of Sound and Vibration

The other is not identified.

The Guardian

The tune is not identified.

Columbia University

The witness is not identified.

The Washington Post

The author is not identified.

The Guardian

The doctor, a colonel, is not identified in the report.

The New York Times

Despite working with the chancellor at the Treasury, she is not identified as a Brownite.

The Guardian

The man is not identified as a suspect, Sergeant Vance said.

The New York Times

Another frustration for the curious: some of the footage is not identified.

The New York Times - Arts

The town is N. Y. but is not identified as such.

The New Yorker

The lord chief justice, Lord Judge, is not identified as a supporter.

The Guardian

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "is not identified" when the subject's identity or specific characteristics are unknown or have not yet been established. Ensure the context clearly indicates what is lacking identification to avoid ambiguity.

Common error

Avoid using "is not identified" excessively in passive voice constructions, as it can make your writing sound vague or indirect. Consider rewriting the sentence in active voice if possible, or using a more specific verb to describe the lack of identification.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "is not identified" functions as a passive construction, indicating that the subject has not been recognized or specified. Ludwig examples confirm its usage in scenarios where the identity or characteristics of something are unknown.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

43%

Science

43%

Academia

8%

Less common in

Formal & Business

3%

Encyclopedias

0%

Social Media

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "is not identified" is a common and grammatically correct passive construction used to indicate that something or someone has not been recognized or specified. Ludwig AI confirms its validity and usability in various contexts. It is most frequently found in news and media, and scientific publications, and academic contexts. When using this phrase, ensure clarity regarding what lacks identification and consider whether active voice might provide a stronger, more direct statement. Alternatives like "remains unknown" or "has not been identified" can be used depending on the desired nuance. Avoiding overuse in passive constructions will improve the clarity and impact of your writing.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

is not recognised

Uses the British English spelling of 'recognised'.

has not been identified

Shifts the tense to present perfect passive, emphasizing the ongoing state of being unidentified.

remains unrecognised

Changes the verb to 'remains' and uses the word 'unrecognised' instead of 'is not identified'.

is still unidentified

Uses the adjective form 'unidentified' with 'still' to highlight the continued lack of identification.

cannot be identified

Indicates an inability to identify, rather than a simple lack of identification.

is yet to be identified

Emphasizes that identification is expected to occur in the future.

is not specified

Focuses on the lack of specific details being provided.

remains unknown

Simplifies the phrase to indicate that the subject is not known.

lacks identification

Rephrases using 'lacks' to indicate the absence of identification.

is not determined

Shifts focus to the lack of a determination or conclusion about identity.

FAQs

How can I use "is not identified" in a sentence?

Use "is not identified" when you want to express that something or someone has not been recognized or specified. For example, "The suspect in the case "is not identified" pending further investigation."

What's the difference between "is not identified" and "is unidentified"?

"Is not identified" is a passive construction emphasizing the action of identification that has not occurred. "Is unidentified" uses "unidentified" as an adjective, simply describing the current state. The choice depends on whether you want to emphasize the action or the state.

What are some alternatives to "is not identified"?

Depending on the context, you can use alternatives such as "remains unknown", "is unspecified", or "has not been identified" to convey a similar meaning.

Is it better to use active or passive voice when something is unknown?

While "is not identified" is grammatically correct, active voice can often provide more clarity. Instead of "The cause "is not identified"", consider "Researchers have not identified the cause" to directly state who has not performed the identification.