has not been identified

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "has not been identified" is correct and usable in written English.
You could use this phrase in a sentence such as: "The source of the leak has not been identified."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Academia

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

59 human-written examples

The official has not been identified.

The New York Times

The person has not been identified.

The New York Times

He has not been identified.

The New York Times

The child's mother has not been identified.

The New York Times

One body has not been identified.

The New York Times

The maker, JA, has not been identified.

The New York Times - Arts

The second company has not been identified.

The Guardian

The substance has not been identified.

The New York Times

The prudish owner has not been identified.

The Guardian - Arts

The fan has not been identified.

The New York Times - Sports

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

1 human-written examples

So far, the man hasn't been identified.

Huffington Post

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "has not been identified", ensure the context clearly indicates what or who remains unidentified. Provide relevant background information to help the reader understand the significance of the missing identification.

Common error

Avoid using "has not been identified" when an active voice would be more direct and informative. If the actor is known, consider rephrasing to highlight who is failing to identify something.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "has not been identified" functions as a passive construction indicating that the subject's identity or nature is currently unknown. It is frequently used in reports, articles, and academic papers to denote a lack of specific information. As shown in Ludwig, the usage of this phrase is grammatically sound.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

53%

Science

31%

Academia

12%

Less common in

Wiki

3%

Formal & Business

1%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "has not been identified" is a versatile and grammatically sound phrase used to indicate that something or someone remains unknown. As Ludwig AI confirms, it is correct and commonly used across diverse contexts such as news, science, and academia. When employing this phrase, ensure that the context is clear and that it accurately reflects the state of uncertainty. While alternatives exist, such as "remains unidentified" or "is yet to be identified", the core purpose of conveying a lack of specific knowledge remains consistent.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

remains unidentified

Uses a different verb and adjective to convey the same meaning.

is yet to be identified

Emphasizes that the identification process is still ongoing.

has not been ascertained

Replaces "identified" with "ascertained", indicating a more formal tone.

is still unknown

Simplifies the phrase to indicate a lack of knowledge.

identity remains unknown

Focuses on the "identity" and its state of being unknown.

has eluded identification

Implies that efforts to identify have been unsuccessful.

has not been determined

Shifts the focus from identifying to determining a characteristic or fact.

is not yet known

Offers a more concise and direct alternative.

has escaped detection

Suggests that something has actively avoided being found or identified.

has not surfaced

Indicates that something has not come to light or been revealed.

FAQs

How can I use "has not been identified" in a sentence?

Use "has not been identified" to indicate that something or someone is currently unknown, such as "The cause of the outbreak "has not been identified"."

What phrases are similar to "has not been identified"?

Alternatives include "remains unidentified", "is yet to be identified", or "is still unknown", depending on the specific context.

Is it better to use active or passive voice with "has not been identified"?

While "has not been identified" is grammatically correct, consider using the active voice if the actor is known, as this can make the sentence more direct and clear.

What's the difference between "has not been identified" and "has not been determined"?

"Has not been identified" usually refers to the specific identity of something or someone being unknown. "Has not been determined" indicates that a fact or characteristic is still uncertain or unconfirmed.