is limits to

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "is limits to" is not correct in English.
Did you mean "has limits to" or "is limited to"? You can use a corrected version of this phrase when discussing restrictions or boundaries related to a subject or situation. Example: "The project is limited to a budget of $10,000."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

Science

News & Media

Encyclopedias

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

2 human-written examples

On the one hand, this 'deterministic' estimation of uncertainties is limits to the range of the perturbation (|delta| = 6-86-8%see, e.g., [27 29].

Journal of Mathematics in Industry

To be exact they recognized minima naturalia, that is limits to how far a specific kind of body, like water or flesh, could physically be divided and still remain that specific kind of body and not instead be converted into some other kind of body (Avicenna, 2009, III.12, 2 9; Averroes, 1962, ad 1.4 & 3.7; for studies see Glasner, 2001 & 2009, ch. 8; Cerami, 2012; McGinnis, 2015).

SEP

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

53 human-written examples

Rapid growth is limited to emerging markets.

The Economist

Its membership is limited to 40.

Encyclopedia Britannica

Membership is limited to 25 men.

The New Yorker

Education is limited to nine years.

The Economist

Settlement is limited to low, isolated hills.

Encyclopedia Britannica

Treatment is limited to alleviating symptoms.

Encyclopedia Britannica

Space is limited to 12.

The New York Times - Travel

But it is limited to the exonerated.

The New York Times - Magazine

Mr. Sullivan is limited to Florida, Washington, Mississippi and New York.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Always use the correct grammatical form "is limited to" instead of the incorrect "is limits to" when indicating restrictions or boundaries.

Common error

Avoid using "is limits to". The correct form is "is limited to". For example, instead of saying "Access is limits to authorized personnel", say "Access is limited to authorized personnel".

Linguistic Context

The phrase "is limits to" is grammatically incorrect. The correct form is "is limited to", functioning as a passive verb phrase indicating restriction. Ludwig AI confirms the grammatical error.

Expression frequency: Rare

Frequent in

Science

33%

News & Media

33%

Encyclopedias

33%

Less common in

Formal & Business

0%

Wiki

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "is limits to" is grammatically incorrect, as confirmed by Ludwig AI. The correct form is "is limited to". While the intent is to express a restriction or boundary, the incorrect grammar hinders clear communication. Usage is rare, appearing in a mix of sources, but primarily unsuitable for formal contexts due to its grammatical error. Always use "is limited to" or a suitable alternative like "is restricted to" to ensure clarity and grammatical correctness.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

is limited to

Replaces the incorrect "is limits to" with the correct passive form, indicating a restriction.

is restricted to

Similar to "is limited to", but emphasizes a more formal or imposed constraint.

has limitations

Shifts the focus to the existence of limitations rather than the act of limiting.

is subject to limitations

Highlights that something is under the control of certain limiting factors.

there are restrictions on

Rephrases to emphasize the presence of restrictions rather than a direct limitation.

is bounded by

Indicates a boundary or constraint that defines the scope or extent.

is confined to

Suggests a more enclosed or constrained state.

is capped at

Indicates a maximum limit or ceiling.

is delimited by

Implies clear boundaries or limits that define something.

does not exceed

Focuses on the upper bound of a quantity or range.

FAQs

What is the correct way to say "is limits to"?

The correct way to express this concept is to use the phrase "is limited to". This indicates that something is restricted or confined within certain boundaries.

How can I use "is limited to" in a sentence?

You can use "is limited to" to describe restrictions. For example: "Access to the building is limited to employees only."

What are some alternatives to saying "is limited to"?

Some alternatives include "is restricted to", "is confined to", or "has limitations", depending on the specific context.

What's the difference between "is limits to" and "is limited to"?

"Is limits to" is grammatically incorrect. The correct phrase is "is limited to", which means something is restricted or has boundaries.