Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
investigated by
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
"investigated by" is a perfectly correct and usable phrase in written English.
You can use it when you are referring to an investigation conducted by someone or an organization. For example, "The murder was investigated by the local police department."
✓ Grammatically correct
News & Media
Science & Research
Alternative expressions(20)
is equivalent to
in the wishes of
rapidly thereafter
for the immediate future
Very soon
somewhere later
one week before
at the early time
in the next weeks
during the previous years
it is important to remember
not yet completed
to avoid disruption
in accordance with direction from
a couple of books before
if not soon
in two days
as excellent as
in a flash
as instructed by the directive
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
60 human-written examples
Which is being investigated by 12 specialist investigators".
News & Media
(The incident is being investigated by NATO).
News & Media
"We got investigated by the tax office.
News & Media
Now complaints are investigated by Ipsa.
News & Media
Intracellular localization was investigated by TEM.
Science & Research
He had been investigated by intelligence services.
News & Media
This allegation was investigated by the department.
News & Media
This was not investigated by the PCC.
News & Media
One case was investigated by both groups.
News & Media
— could have been investigated by now.
News & Media
They will be investigated by the I.O.C.'s ethics commission.
News & Media
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
When using "investigated by", ensure the subject is clearly defined, specifying who or what is conducting the investigation. For instance, instead of saying "The matter was investigated", specify "The matter was investigated by the police."
Common error
Avoid excessive passive voice constructions. While "investigated by" is grammatically correct, using active voice can often make your writing more direct and engaging. For example, instead of "The crime was investigated by detectives", consider "Detectives investigated the crime."
Source & Trust
93%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "investigated by" functions as a passive construction, indicating that a subject is the recipient of an action performed by an agent. According to Ludwig AI, this is a perfectly acceptable phrase. It is commonly used to specify who or what entity is conducting an investigation.
Frequent in
News & Media
66%
Science & Research
18%
Formal & Business
6%
Less common in
Academia
3%
Encyclopedias
3%
Wiki
4%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
The phrase "investigated by" is a grammatically sound and frequently used passive construction that clearly identifies the entity responsible for conducting an investigation. As Ludwig AI confirms, it is a correct and usable phrase. It is commonly found in news reports, scientific articles, and formal documents. When writing, ensure that the subject is clearly defined and, where appropriate, consider using the active voice for more direct prose. While versatile, be mindful of register, as its frequent use in formal contexts may make it sound out of place in casual conversation.
More alternative expressions(6)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
examined by
Focuses on a detailed inspection or review, similar to an investigation but potentially less formal.
probed by
Emphasizes a thorough inquiry to uncover hidden information, similar to a detailed investigation.
scrutinized by
Highlights a critical and detailed examination, often implying a search for flaws or errors.
reviewed by
Suggests a formal assessment or evaluation, often conducted by an authority or expert.
looked into by
Offers a more informal and less intensive examination or inquiry.
assessed by
Focuses on evaluating the merit, significance, or nature of something, implying a judgement.
audited by
Specifically refers to a systematic examination of financial or operational records.
inspected by
Implies a physical or visual examination to ensure compliance or identify issues.
researched by
Indicates a systematic inquiry or study to discover or revise facts, theories, etc.
under the microscope of
Suggests extremely close and critical scrutiny, often implying public attention.
FAQs
How can I use "investigated by" in a sentence?
You can use "investigated by" to indicate who is conducting an investigation. For example, "The allegations were "investigated by" the ethics committee".
What are some alternatives to saying "investigated by"?
Alternatives include "examined by", "probed by", or "scrutinized by", depending on the specific nuance you wish to convey.
Is it better to use active or passive voice with "investigated by"?
While "investigated by" is grammatically correct in the passive voice, using the active voice (e.g., "The police investigated the crime") can often make your writing more direct and impactful. It depends on whether you want to emphasize the investigator or the subject of the investigation.
What's the difference between "investigated by" and "reviewed by"?
"Investigated by" implies a more in-depth inquiry, often related to potential wrongdoing. "Reviewed by" suggests a more general assessment or evaluation. For example, a crime is "investigated by" detectives, while a document is "reviewed by" a lawyer.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
93%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested