intimidation by

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "intimidation by" is correct and usable in written English. You can use it when describing a situation where someone feels threatened or coerced by another person or group. Example: "The employee reported intimidation by their supervisor during the meeting." Alternative expressions include "coercion from" and "threats by."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

57 human-written examples

That was a first: intimidation by lecture.

The New York Times

He condemns intimidation by employees and employers.

The Guardian

Reports of abductions and intimidation by the TMVP are legion.

The Economist

Hence Maher's understandable hostility to "intimidation by sponsor pullout".

The New Yorker

Intimidation by militant supporters of the governing party is routine.

The New York Times

The widening intimidation by the militants takes many forms.

The New York Times

Journalists have also complained of intimidation by the military government.

The New York Times

He said he did not condone threats or "any kind of intimidation" by hackers.

The New York Times

She wanted to end years of abuse and intimidation by local youths.

The Economist

China's independent lawyers have long risked beatings and intimidation by local officials.

The Economist

This country will not suffer intimidation by the United States of America.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "intimidation by", ensure the agent causing the intimidation is clearly identified to avoid ambiguity.

Common error

Do not use "intimidation by" without specifying who is doing the intimidating. Vague attributions can weaken your statement and make it less impactful.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "intimidation by" functions as a prepositional phrase, typically modifying a noun or verb to indicate the source or agent of the intimidation. As noted by Ludwig, it is grammatically correct and commonly used.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

75%

Science

15%

Formal & Business

5%

Less common in

Wiki

3%

Encyclopedias

1%

Social Media

1%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "intimidation by" is a grammatically sound and frequently used phrase that serves to attribute the action of intimidation to a specific source. Ludwig AI confirms that it is correct and suitable for various contexts, from news reporting to formal documents. The phrase appears most commonly in news and media, with usage ranging from describing political coercion to workplace harassment. When employing this phrase, ensure the source of intimidation is clearly identified for maximum clarity and impact.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

coercion through

Focuses on the act of compelling someone through force or threats, similar to intimidation but emphasizes the method.

menace from

Highlights the threatening aspect of the action, suggesting a direct danger or harm.

duress exerted by

Emphasizes the pressure or constraint applied, indicating a lack of free will.

bullying via

Specifically refers to aggressive behavior intended to dominate or subdue, often in a repeated manner.

compulsion under

Implies that actions are taken because of irresistible pressure or obligation, altering the reason.

oppression inflicted by

Indicates a prolonged and unjust exercise of power, suggesting a more systematic form of dominance.

undue influence from

Refers to situations where trust or authority is manipulated to affect decisions unfairly.

pressure from

Broadly describes the act of trying to persuade someone, adding a stress on the external enforcement.

victimization by

Highlights that someone has been unfairly targeted, focusing on the damaged situation.

frightening through

Centers on the act of instilling fear to control actions, thus affecting the target.

FAQs

How is "intimidation by" used in a sentence?

You can use "intimidation by" to describe situations where someone is being coerced or threatened. For example: "The witness reported "intimidation by" the defendant's associates."

What are some alternatives to "intimidation by"?

Alternatives include "coercion through", "menace from", or "duress exerted by", each emphasizing different aspects of the coercive action.

Is it correct to say "intimidation from" instead of "intimidation by"?

While "intimidation from" might be understood, ""intimidation by"" is the more standard and grammatically sound choice.

What does "intimidation by" imply in a legal context?

In a legal context, ""intimidation by"" suggests unlawful coercion or threats used to influence someone's actions, often violating their rights or freedoms.