in outrage

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "in outrage" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to describe a state of being angry or indignant about something, often in response to an injustice or wrongdoing. Example: "The community reacted in outrage to the unfair treatment of the workers."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Republicans have howled in outrage.

The New York Times

It's couched in outrage.

The Guardian

The celebrants flee in outrage.

The New York Times - Arts

Twitter already roiled in outrage at Monsegur's light sentence.

The New Yorker

His assassination united Lebanon's multiple factions in outrage.

The Economist

Republicans erupted in outrage, though they produced no specific alternative.

The New York Times

Thousands of members resigned in outrage, and donations declined sharply.

The New York Times

The Washpost ran it, and the Pentagon erupted in outrage.

The New York Times

The following day, Redstone called Freston in outrage.

The New Yorker

"No, no, I am serious," Chomet insists, half in outrage.

The Guardian - Film

Simple, the consultant said, his voice a study in outrage.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When writing about sensitive topics, ensure the use of "in outrage" is justified and supported by evidence. Overusing it can diminish its impact and credibility.

Common error

Avoid using "in outrage" excessively in sensationalized or exaggerated contexts. It can detract from the credibility of your writing. Instead, reserve it for situations where the emotional response is genuinely justified and significant.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "in outrage" functions as a prepositional phrase, modifying a verb or noun to describe the manner or state in which an action is performed or a feeling is experienced. According to Ludwig AI, the phrase follows standard grammar rules.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

70%

Formal & Business

15%

Science

5%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

3%

Social Media

2%

Reference

5%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "in outrage" is a common and grammatically correct prepositional phrase used to express strong indignation or anger in response to perceived injustice or wrongdoing. Ludwig AI confirms its grammatical correctness and frequent usage. It is most commonly found in news and media contexts but also appears in formal writing. While several alternatives exist, such as "in indignation" or "with outrage", "in outrage" effectively conveys a sense of moral anger. When using this phrase, ensure it is appropriate to the context and avoid overuse to maintain its impact.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

with outrage

Rephrases the expression, maintaining the same meaning but using a different grammatical structure.

in indignation

Highlights a sense of righteous anger and offense.

outraged

Past participle, used as an adjective to describe a state of feeling outraged.

in anger

Focuses more on the emotion of anger, lacking the sense of moral indignation.

incensed

Adjective describing someone who is extremely angry and indignant.

in fury

Emphasizes intense anger and rage.

in disgust

Conveys a strong feeling of revulsion and disapproval.

in protest

Indicates an expression of disapproval or objection.

up in arms

Describes a state of being angry and ready to protest.

in disbelief

Highlights shock and incredulity, often preceding outrage.

FAQs

How can I effectively use "in outrage" in a sentence?

Use "in outrage" to describe a strong emotional reaction to something considered unjust or wrong. For example, "The community responded "in outrage" to the new policy."

What are some alternatives to "in outrage"?

Depending on the context, you can use phrases like "in indignation", "in anger", or "with outrage" to convey similar meanings.

Is it grammatically correct to say "with outrage" instead of "in outrage"?

Yes, both "in outrage" and "with outrage" are grammatically correct and can be used interchangeably, although "in outrage" is more common.

What distinguishes "in outrage" from "in anger"?

"In outrage" often implies a sense of moral indignation or injustice, while "in anger" simply indicates a feeling of strong displeasure or antagonism.