with outrage

USAGE SUMMARY

"with outrage" is a valid and usable phrase in written English.
It is generally used to express intense anger or indignation towards something. Example: The protesters marched through the streets with outrage, demanding justice for the innocent victims of the government's corrupt actions.

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Wiki

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

55 human-written examples

Southerners responded with outrage.

The New York Times

Cyberspace is awash with outrage.

The New York Times

Some students react with outrage.

The New York Times

Mr. Ossy surged with outrage.

The New York Times

Forest is burning with outrage.

The Economist

Mr. Broun responded with outrage.

The New York Times

Residents responded with outrage.

The New York Times

The women in line howled with outrage.

The New York Times

It's like Soylent Green, but with outrage.

The Guardian - Opinion

Many students responded with outrage.

The New York Times

Mr. Hardin responded with outrage.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "with outrage" to vividly depict a strong, immediate negative reaction to something perceived as unjust or wrong. It effectively conveys the intensity of the emotion.

Common error

Avoid using "with outrage" when a milder expression of disagreement or disappointment is more appropriate. Overusing strong emotional terms can dilute their impact and make your writing seem hyperbolic.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "with outrage" functions primarily as an adverbial phrase, modifying a verb to describe the manner in which an action is performed. As shown by Ludwig AI, it indicates that an action is carried out with intense anger or indignation, adding emotional emphasis to the verb.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

86%

Wiki

7%

Science

7%

Less common in

Formal & Business

0%

Academia

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "with outrage" is a powerful tool for expressing intense anger and indignation, as Ludwig AI confirms. It's most frequently found in news and media contexts, used to describe strong negative reactions to perceived injustices. While grammatically correct and widely used, it's important to consider the context and avoid overuse, reserving it for situations where the emotional intensity is genuinely warranted. Alternative phrases like "with indignation" or "in a fit of anger" can offer nuanced ways to convey similar sentiments. Remember to use "with outrage" judiciously to maintain its impact and credibility.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

reacting with fury

Highlights the reaction, focusing on intense anger.

responding with indignation

Emphasizes the righteous anger felt in response to perceived unfairness.

in a state of indignation

Highlights the sense of injustice causing the anger.

erupting in fury

Suggests a sudden and violent outburst of anger.

in a fit of anger

Focuses more on the uncontrolled emotional state leading to anger.

displaying intense anger

Focuses on the visible manifestation of anger.

seething with resentment

Emphasizes a suppressed, long-lasting anger.

filled with animosity

Stresses the feeling of strong dislike or hostility.

expressing strong disapproval

Focuses on the act of showing disagreement rather than the emotional state.

in vehement opposition

Indicates strong disagreement and resistance, not necessarily emotional anger.

FAQs

How can I use "with outrage" in a sentence?

You can use "with outrage" to describe someone's reaction to something they find deeply offensive or unjust. For example, "The community responded "with outrage" to the proposed development plans".

What are some synonyms for "with outrage"?

Some synonyms for "with outrage" include "with indignation", "with fury", or "in a fit of anger". The best choice depends on the specific nuance you want to convey.

Is it always appropriate to respond "with outrage"?

While expressing strong feelings is sometimes necessary, consider whether a measured response might be more effective. "With outrage" is best reserved for situations where the perceived injustice is truly significant.

What's the difference between reacting "with outrage" and "with disappointment"?

Reacting "with outrage" implies a strong sense of anger and injustice, while reacting "with disappointment" suggests sadness or regret that something didn't meet expectations. Outrage is a much stronger emotion.