in contract with

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "in contract with" is correct and can be used in written English.
It is often used to describe a formal agreement or arrangement between two parties. Here is an example sentence: "The company entered into a contract with the manufacturer to produce their new product line."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Academia

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

46 human-written examples

The Steinbergs are now in contract with the second bidder.

The New York Times

One deal fell through, and now he is in contract with another buyer.

The New York Times

But another studio entrepreneur, Louis Madigan, has been in contract with the yard since 1998.

The New York Times

Hamilton decided to sell her apartment; last week, she was in contract with a buyer.

The New Yorker

Here we were in contract with a client — it was not acceptable for us to pass that on to them".

The New York Times

Of 304 apartments, 140 have been sold and 9 are in contract, with 49 under one- or two-year leases.

The New York Times

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

14 human-written examples

There are already changes afoot at Bristol, which is implementing an opt-in contract with students that would allow for contact with nominated next of kin if major concerns arise about their wellbeing.

The Guardian

"This includes implementing an opt-in contract with our students which would enable contact with nominated emergency contact if we had a major concern about their wellbeing," the statement said.

The Guardian

Iowa has $3 million in contracts with Pearson.

The New York Times

Now three law professors suggest that companies are far less likely to use arbitration clauses in contracts with each other than they are in contracts with consumers.

The New York Times

The county has more than $26 million in contracts with Arizona companies this year.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "in contract with", ensure that both parties involved in the agreement are clearly identified to avoid ambiguity in your writing.

Common error

Avoid using "in contract with" when simply implying a business relationship. This phrase indicates a legally binding agreement, so ensure the context supports this level of formality.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "in contract with" primarily functions as a prepositional phrase indicating a formal agreement or legally binding relationship between two or more parties. Ludwig confirms its accurate usage in various contexts.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

39%

Science

35%

Academia

11%

Less common in

Formal & Business

10%

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "in contract with" is a common and grammatically correct prepositional phrase used to describe a legally binding agreement between two or more parties. As demonstrated by Ludwig, it appears frequently in news, scientific, and academic contexts, indicating a formal relationship. While alternatives like "under contract with" and "having a contract with" exist, it's essential to use "in contract with" when the context involves a clear contractual obligation. Remember to ensure the specificity of the parties and the formality of the agreement when employing this phrase to avoid any ambiguity.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

under contract with

This alternative focuses on the current state of being bound by a contract.

having a contract with

This version emphasizes the existence of a contractual relationship.

engaged in a contract with

This emphasizes the active involvement in a contractual relationship.

in agreement with

This phrase is broader and can refer to any form of agreement, not necessarily a formal contract.

contractually bound to

This highlights the legal obligation created by the contract.

legally committed to

This stresses the legal aspect of the commitment established by the contract.

under a contractual obligation to

This phrase emphasizes the duty imposed by the contract.

formally agreed with

Focuses on the action of reaching an agreement.

in partnership with

This suggests a collaborative agreement that may or may not be strictly contractual.

having an arrangement with

This phrase is less formal than "in contract with" and suggests a less binding agreement.

FAQs

How can I use "in contract with" in a sentence?

You can use "in contract with" to describe a situation where two or more parties have a legally binding agreement. For instance, "The company is "in contract with" a supplier for raw materials".

What's the difference between "in contract with" and "in agreement with"?

"In agreement with" is a more general term that suggests alignment or consensus, while "in contract with" specifically indicates a legally binding agreement.

What are some alternatives to saying "in contract with"?

Depending on the context, you could use alternatives such as "under contract with", "having a contract with", or "contractually bound to".

Is it correct to say "in contract with"?

Yes, "in contract with" is grammatically correct and widely used to indicate a formal, legally binding agreement between parties.