identified with

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "identified with" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when you want to express that a person or thing is associated with something else in some way. For example: Many people identify with the struggles of the LGBTQ community.

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Encyclopedias

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

53 human-written examples

I identified with her.

The New York Times

Can be identified with.

The Guardian - Opinion

I identified with men.

The Guardian - Music

Listeners identified with her.

The New York Times - Arts

I completely identified with him.

The New Yorker

She succumbed & identified with perfume.

The New Yorker

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

7 human-written examples

They identify with it.

The New York Times

They identify with me.

The New York Times - Magazine

"They identify with us.

The New York Times

"To identify with our people".

The New York Times

He also identifies with you.

The New York Times - Arts

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "identified with" to clearly convey a sense of shared experience, understanding, or emotional connection with a person, group, or idea. Be specific about the nature of the identification to avoid ambiguity.

Common error

While "identified with" is common, avoid overusing it in formal writing where more precise language may be appropriate. Consider alternatives like "related to" or "associated with" for a more objective tone.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "identified with" functions as a verb phrase indicating a sense of connection, empathy, or shared experience between an individual and another person, group, or idea. Ludwig examples confirm its role in expressing personal alignment.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

45%

Science

20%

Wiki

15%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

5%

Formal & Business

5%

Reference

5%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "identified with" is a common and grammatically sound way to express a sense of connection, empathy, or shared experience. Ludwig AI confirms its correctness and usability in various contexts, particularly in news media and personal narratives. While versatile, be mindful of its usage in overly formal settings where more precise language might be preferred. When using "identified with", ensure the context clearly reflects the nature of the connection to avoid ambiguity. Remember that you can use alternatives like "empathized with", "related to" or "resonated with".

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

Empathized with

Similar to 'felt empathy for', but implies a deeper understanding.

Saw oneself in

Highlights a direct comparison and recognition of similarities.

Resonated with

Suggests a personal and emotional connection or agreement.

Felt empathy for

Focuses specifically on emotional understanding and shared feelings.

Shared a bond with

Highlights a strong and meaningful connection.

Related to

Suggests a connection or link, but not necessarily an emotional one.

Connected with

Implies a bond or association that may not be explicitly emotional.

Felt akin to

Indicates a sense of similarity or kinship.

Understood deeply

Focuses on comprehension and insight into another's situation.

Found common ground with

Emphasizes shared interests or experiences.

FAQs

How can I use "identified with" in a sentence?

You can use "identified with" to show a connection or understanding with someone or something. For example, "I "identified with" the main character's struggles."

What's a good substitute for "identified with"?

Alternatives include "empathized with", "related to", or "resonated with" depending on the specific context.

Is it correct to say "I identify to" instead of "I identified with"?

No, "I identify to" is grammatically incorrect. The correct usage is "I "identified with"" or "I identify "myself with"".

What's the difference between "identified with" and "associated with"?

"Identified with" implies a deeper, more personal connection or understanding, while "associated with" suggests a more general or external link. For instance, a fan might "identified with" a character, but a brand is "associated with" a celebrity.