held with

USAGE SUMMARY

"held with" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when you want to express that someone is in possession of something. For example, "She held the baby with one arm while she opened the door with the other."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Encyclopedias

Formal & Business

Wiki

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

A similar trend held with fact-checking.

The New York Times

Another game held with ease.

The Guardian - Sport

It showed no meetings held with Local School Councils.

The New York Times

Discussions have been held with San Antonio.

The New York Times - Sports

Shiva will be held with family.

The New York Times

No summit meetings have been held with China since 2001.

The Economist

The rest remained held, with bail set at $1,000.

The New York Times

He is being held with bail set at $2.9 million.

The New York Times

Ljubicic held with an ace to tie it 4-all.

The New York Times - Sports

The head is held with the forehead downward.

Encyclopedia Britannica

Competitions are held with both bait-casting and fly tackle.

Encyclopedia Britannica

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "held with", ensure the context clearly indicates what is being held and with what or whom. For example, "The meeting was held with key stakeholders" provides clarity.

Common error

Avoid using "held with" in passive constructions where it obscures the actor. For instance, instead of saying "The event was held with great enthusiasm", specify who held the event and expressed the enthusiasm: "The organizers held the event with great enthusiasm."

Linguistic Context

The phrase "held with" primarily functions as a verb phrase + preposition, indicating that an event, discussion, or process occurred in conjunction or association with something else. Ludwig examples highlight its use in various contexts, from meetings to physical holding.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

35%

Science

30%

Wiki

15%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

10%

Formal & Business

10%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "held with" is a versatile phrase used to indicate that something occurred in conjunction or association with something else. As Ludwig AI confirmed, it is grammatically correct and commonly used across various contexts, including news, science, encyclopedias, formal business, and wiki sources. The phrase functions as a verb phrase + preposition, and its frequency of use is very common, making it a reliable choice in both formal and informal writing. Remember to ensure clarity in your sentences by specifying what is being held and with what or whom. While generally neutral in tone, its suitability depends on the specific context and surrounding language.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

jointly held with

Specifically refers to shared ownership or responsibility.

conducted with

Focuses on the act of carrying out an activity alongside something else.

carried out with

Emphasizes the execution of a task in conjunction with something else.

performed with

Highlights the enactment of something along with another element.

done in conjunction with

Stresses the collaborative or simultaneous nature of two actions.

executed together with

Implies a more formal and coordinated execution alongside something.

accompanied by

Indicates that something happens alongside or as a result of something else.

featured with

Highlights the presence or inclusion of something else.

conversations with

Emphasizes a discussion or dialogue.

meetings with

Focuses on scheduled gatherings or appointments.

FAQs

How can I use "held with" in a sentence?

Use "held with" to indicate an action or event that took place in conjunction with something else. For example, "The negotiations were "held with" the opposing party".

What are some alternatives to "held with"?

Alternatives include phrases like "conducted with", "carried out with", or "performed with", depending on the specific nuance you want to convey.

Is there a difference between "held with" and "held by"?

"Held with" indicates that something occurred alongside something else, while "held by" indicates possession or control. For example, "The meeting was "held with" the committee" versus "The position was "held by" the chairman".

Can "held with" be used in both formal and informal contexts?

Yes, "held with" is suitable for both formal and informal contexts. Its appropriateness depends on the surrounding language and the overall tone of the communication.