conducted with

USAGE SUMMARY

"conducted with" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when referring to an activity that is happening with a certain approach or methodology, or with a certain group of people. Example sentence: The survey was conducted with a sample of 500 people from across the country.

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

58 human-written examples

Conducted with A.R.E.

The New York Times - Travel

David LaMarche conducted with brio.

The New York Times - Arts

Mr. Barker conducted with brio.

The New York Times - Arts

Rectal exams were conducted with "excessive force".

The Guardian

Andrews Sill conducted with tame efficiency.

The New York Times - Arts

Lifelogging can be conducted with minimal engagement.

The New Yorker

Mr. Manahan conducted with his pencil.

The New York Times

Conducted with Queen of Cups Inc., www.queenofcups.com.

The New York Times - Travel

Graeme Jenkins, conducted with spirit and grace.

The Guardian - Music

It was conducted with ruthless efficiency.

The Guardian

And all conducted with such propriety.

The Guardian - Books

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Specify the 'instrument' of the action to enhance clarity. For instance, "The interview was conducted with a translator" provides more information than simply "The interview was conducted."

Common error

Avoid overuse of the passive voice when using "conducted with". While grammatically correct, it can sometimes make your writing sound less direct. Prefer active constructions where appropriate; for example, instead of saying "The survey was conducted with precision", consider saying "The team conducted the survey with precision."

Linguistic Context

The phrase "conducted with" functions as a verb phrase followed by a prepositional phrase. It modifies a verb by specifying the manner, instrument, or quality with which an action is performed. Ludwig AI confirms its correct usage, as demonstrated in various examples.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

34%

News & Media

64%

Formal & Business

2%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "conducted with" is a versatile and grammatically sound expression used to describe how an action is performed. As Ludwig AI confirms, it’s appropriate for both formal and informal writing. Its frequent appearance in news, media, and scientific contexts highlights its wide applicability. When writing, ensure the subject is clear and active constructions are preferred for directness. Consider alternatives like "performed using" or "carried out with" for variety.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

carried out with

Emphasizes the manner or quality in which something is executed.

undertaken with

Similar to "carried out with", but often implies a more formal or serious endeavor.

performed using

Focuses on the tool or method used during performance.

done utilizing

Highlights the specific tools or resources used in the process.

executed through

Highlights the means or channel through which an action is completed.

pursued using

Focuses on the methods and resources used to achieve a particular goal.

implemented via

Focuses on the specific system or process used for implementation.

realized via

Emphasizes the pathway or means through which something is brought into reality.

achieved through

Emphasizes the process or method leading to a particular achievement.

effected by means of

Highlights the instruments or methods that bring about a particular effect.

FAQs

How can I use "conducted with" in a sentence?

You can use "conducted with" to describe how an action or activity was performed. For example, "The experiment was conducted with meticulous attention to detail" or "The negotiations were conducted with respect and diplomacy".

What are some alternatives to "conducted with"?

Some alternatives include "performed using", "carried out with", or "executed through", depending on the specific context and nuance you want to convey.

Is it better to use "conducted with" or a more active construction?

While "conducted with" is grammatically correct, using a more active construction can often make your writing clearer and more direct. For example, instead of "The investigation was conducted with diligence", you could say "The detectives conducted the investigation with diligence."

What does "conducted with" imply about the action being described?

"Conducted with" typically implies that the action was performed in a specific manner, using a particular tool, or exhibiting a certain quality. It adds detail about how the action was carried out.