heavily damaged

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "heavily damaged" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it to describe the condition of something that has been severely damaged, usually by a natural disaster or accident. For example: "The town was heavily damaged by the hurricane."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Encyclopedias

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

The mosque was heavily damaged.

The New York Times

It was heavily damaged in the crash.

The New York Times

Mr. Scruggs's home was heavily damaged.

The New York Times

Both copies of the song are incomplete and heavily damaged.

Massachusetts Institute of Technology

Many roads and other infrastructure were heavily damaged.

Independent

Tikrit has already been heavily damaged in months of violence.

Independent

There the flotilla was heavily damaged, and Foote sustained injuries.

Encyclopedia Britannica

The fourth, fifth and sixth floors were also heavily damaged.

The New York Times

In World War II it was heavily damaged again.

Encyclopedia Britannica

It was heavily damaged in World Wars I and II.

Encyclopedia Britannica

The city was heavily damaged by an earthquake in 2001.

Encyclopedia Britannica

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When describing damage, be specific about the cause. For example, instead of saying "The building was heavily damaged", specify "The building was heavily damaged by the earthquake".

Common error

Avoid using "heavily damaged" without providing sufficient context about the type and extent of the damage. Instead of simply stating that something is "heavily damaged", elaborate on the specific areas or components that sustained significant harm.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "heavily damaged" functions primarily as a descriptive adjective phrase. It modifies a noun to indicate the extent of damage. As supported by Ludwig AI, this phrase is widely accepted and utilized across numerous contexts.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

38%

Science

21%

Encyclopedias

15%

Less common in

Wiki

14%

Academia

8%

Formal & Business

4%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "heavily damaged" is a common and grammatically correct adjective phrase used to describe a state of significant impairment or destruction. Ludwig AI confirms its acceptability and broad applicability. It appears most frequently in News & Media, Science and Encyclopedias contexts, highlighting its role in conveying factual information about substantial harm. When using "heavily damaged", it's best practice to specify the cause of the damage and avoid vague descriptions. Alternatives such as "severely impaired" or "badly harmed" can be used to add nuance. In summary, "heavily damaged" is a versatile and reliable phrase for describing considerable damage across various contexts.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

severely impaired

Emphasizes functional reduction due to damage.

badly harmed

Highlights the negative impact and harm inflicted.

substantially impaired

Focuses on the degree of diminishment or weakening.

extensively ruined

Highlights the breadth and scope of the destruction.

significantly compromised

Indicates a notable reduction in quality or effectiveness.

seriously affected

Focuses on the adverse impact and consequences of the damage.

majorly devastated

Stresses the emotional impact and widespread destruction.

critically wounded

Implies near fatal or irreparable damage.

greatly deteriorated

Highlights the process of worsening and decline.

remarkably impaired

Emphasizes the noteworthiness of the damage.

FAQs

How can I use "heavily damaged" in a sentence?

You can use "heavily damaged" to describe something that has sustained significant damage, like "The car was "heavily damaged" in the accident" or "The crops were "heavily damaged" by the storm".

What are some alternatives to "heavily damaged"?

Alternatives include "severely impaired", "badly harmed", or "extensively ruined", depending on the specific context and nuance you want to convey.

Is it redundant to say "very heavily damaged"?

Yes, adding "very" before "heavily damaged" is generally redundant. The word "heavily" already implies a significant degree of damage, so "very" doesn't add meaningful emphasis.

What's the difference between "heavily damaged" and "slightly damaged"?

"Heavily damaged" indicates severe and extensive damage, while "slightly damaged" suggests minor or superficial damage. The choice depends on the extent of the harm caused.