have repercussions

USAGE SUMMARY

"have repercussions" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use this phrase when referring to the consequences or effects of a certain action or decision. For example: "The company's decision to shift their production to cheaper overseas labor will have repercussions for their local workforce."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Could juryless trials have repercussions elsewhere?

Independent

These things have repercussions at my age".

The Guardian - Music

The narrow defeat will have repercussions.

The Washington Post

But it would have repercussions for decades.

The Washington Post

That could have repercussions for the finances of royal regeneration.

The New York Times

The case could have repercussions for other video streaming services.

The New York Times

Committing turnovers week after week is bound to have repercussions.

The New York Times

"It might have repercussions for me, who knows?" Allardyce said.

Independent

The aggressive policy can have repercussions for regulators.

The New York Times

How it does so will have repercussions throughout the industry.

The New York Times

But intervention on this scale will have repercussions".

The Guardian - Business

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "have repercussions", consider the scope and intensity of the consequences you are describing. Choose related vocabulary that matches the scale of the impact.

Common error

Avoid using "have repercussions" when the consequences are minor or insignificant. Opt for milder terms like "have effects" or "have results" in such cases.

Linguistic Context

Grammatically, "have repercussions" functions as a verb phrase. It typically follows a noun or pronoun indicating the subject that causes the repercussions. Ludwig AI confirms its correct usage in numerous contexts.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

70%

Science

15%

Formal & Business

10%

Less common in

Wiki

3%

Encyclopedias

1%

Reference

1%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "have repercussions" is a grammatically sound and widely used phrase that describes the consequences of an action or event. As Ludwig AI indicates, the phrase is correct and appears in diverse contexts, most frequently in news and media, science, and formal business settings. While alternatives like ""have consequences"" or ""have implications"" exist, "have repercussions" often suggests a more far-reaching and significant impact. When using this phrase, consider the intensity and scope of the effects to ensure it aligns with the situation's gravity. Avoid overstating minor issues with this term.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

have consequences

Emphasizes the direct results or outcomes of an action.

have implications

Focuses on the broader, often indirect, effects of something.

have ramifications

Highlights the complex and far-reaching nature of the consequences.

entail consequences

Suggests that consequences are a necessary result.

give rise to problems

Focuses specifically on negative outcomes or difficulties.

lead to difficulties

Indicates that difficulties are a likely result.

result in setbacks

Emphasizes negative progress or delays.

precipitate issues

Highlights how certain actions can trigger problematic outcomes.

generate fallout

Implies scattered or widespread negative effects.

produce a backlash

Suggests a strong, adverse reaction.

FAQs

How can I use "have repercussions" in a sentence?

You can use "have repercussions" to describe the consequences of an action or decision. For instance, "The new policy will "have repercussions" for all employees."

What are some alternatives to "have repercussions"?

Alternatives include "have consequences", "have implications", and "have ramifications". The choice depends on the specific nuance you want to convey.

Is it better to say "have repercussions" or "suffer repercussions"?

"Have repercussions" describes the action that causes the consequences, while "suffer repercussions" describes the experience of those consequences. For example, "The decision will "have repercussions"", and "The employees will "suffer repercussions"".

What is the difference between "have repercussions" and "have consequences"?

While similar, "have repercussions" often implies more far-reaching or indirect effects than "have consequences". "Have consequences" is a more general term for results, while "have repercussions" often suggests a ripple effect.