have implications

USAGE SUMMARY

"have implications" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when you are speaking about the consequences or outcomes of a certain action; for example, "The changes to the local tax system will have implications for businesses in the area."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Higher prices have implications beyond annoyed authors.

The New York Times

That could have implications for students' families.

The New York Times - Tech

This could have implications for all retailers.

The Guardian - Business

Hana's difficulties have implications for today's controversy.

The New York Times

These results may have implications for immunotherapy.

Nature

The results have implications for global equity.

Stanford University

These differences have implications on Mm.

Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology

It's pioneering work that could have implications for humans, too.

The Guardian - TV & Radio

More seriously, their behaviour can have implications for family life.

The Guardian - Lifestyle

And that may have implications for their well-being.

The New York Times - Magazine

All these changes invariably have implications for the staff.

The Guardian

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "have implications", clearly state what the implications are and for whom or what they matter. This adds clarity and strengthens your argument.

Common error

Avoid exaggerating the importance or scope of the implications. Ensure your claims are supported by evidence and logical reasoning.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "have implications" functions as a verbal phrase used to indicate that something will likely cause future results or impacts. It connects a present action or situation to potential future outcomes. As Ludwig AI confirms, it is correct and widely used.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

34%

News & Media

34%

Formal & Business

32%

Less common in

Academia

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "have implications" is a versatile and grammatically sound expression used to convey that something is likely to have consequences or effects. As Ludwig AI confirms, this phrase is correct and widely used across various domains. Its prevalence in scientific, news, and formal business contexts highlights its importance in analytical and explanatory writing. When using this phrase, ensure you clearly articulate what the implications are to enhance clarity and impact. While alternatives such as "entail consequences" or "lead to ramifications" exist, "have implications" remains a direct and effective choice for expressing potential outcomes.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

involve consequences

This focuses on the inherent link between an action and its results.

entail consequences

This alternative emphasizes the direct and often unavoidable results of an action.

generate effects

This focuses on the production of specific outcomes.

lead to ramifications

This highlights the complex and far-reaching effects that may arise.

result in outcomes

This alternative emphasizes the final results or effects produced by a cause.

give rise to repercussions

This suggests that an action sets off a series of subsequent events, often negative.

pose consequences

This suggests potential or anticipated negative outcomes.

bear significance

This emphasizes the importance and potential impact of something.

create an impact

This suggests a noticeable and potentially transformative effect.

hold importance

This emphasizes the value and relevance of something.

FAQs

How can I use "have implications" in a sentence?

Use "have implications" to discuss the potential consequences or effects of an action or decision. For example, "The new policy will "have implications" for small businesses."

What are some alternatives to "have implications"?

You can use phrases like "entail consequences", "lead to ramifications", or "involve consequences" as alternatives depending on the context.

Which is correct, "have implications" or "has implications"?

"Have implications" is used with plural subjects, while "has implications" is used with singular subjects. For example, "These changes have implications" versus "This change has implications."

What's the difference between "have implications" and "have consequences"?

"Have implications" suggests a broader range of potential effects, while "have consequences" often refers to more direct and immediate results. "Have consequences" often carries a more negative connotation.