have no material

USAGE SUMMARY

The part of the sentence "have no material" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it to describe a situation where you do not possess something physical that is needed for a task. For example, "I need to make a dress, but I have no material."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

59 human-written examples

Khrushchev: All the world knows that we have no material interests whatsoever.

The New York Times

Independent members are not G.E. employees and have no material business relationships with the company.

The New York Times

Novation also said the settlement would have "no material impact" on its financial health.

The New York Times

The Boston-based maker of razor blades said the transaction would have no material effect on its 1990 earnings.

The New York Times

A Rite Aid spokeswoman, Karen Rugen, said the inquiry was expected to have no material impact on the company.

The New York Times

Yet thanks to a pre-nuptial agreement, Mr Brin's prospective divorce would have no material effect on his company.

Independent

In fact, in a statement CBS said: "This will have no material impact to a company of our size.

The New York Times

He said he was convinced the "release will have no material impact on the independent investigation since most of the known witnesses have been interviewed".

The New York Times

Also, a corporate compensation committee should be made up of members of the board who have no material relationship with the company or personal relationship with its management.

The New York Times

A spokesman for Mr. Wilpon said the Madoffs had not invested directly in Sterling Equities and that any potential forfeiture would have no material impact on Sterling.

The New York Times

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

1 human-written examples

"We have no materials for the schools," Janikhel said.

The New Yorker

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "have no material", ensure the context clearly defines what type of material is lacking. For example, "They have no material evidence" is more precise than "They have no material."

Common error

Avoid using "have no material" when referring to abstract concepts. For instance, saying "The argument has no material" is imprecise; instead, use "The argument has no substance" or "The argument is unsubstantiated".

Linguistic Context

The phrase "have no material" primarily functions as a predicate expressing the absence of physical possessions, resources, or tangible evidence. Ludwig AI indicates that the phrase is commonly used and grammatically sound in various contexts.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

70%

Science

15%

Formal & Business

10%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

1%

Wiki

2%

Reference

2%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "have no material" is a versatile expression used to indicate the absence of physical possessions, resources, or tangible evidence. Ludwig AI confirms its grammatical correctness and common usage. It's frequently found in news and media contexts, as well as scientific and formal business writing. While generally neutral in register, ensure clarity by specifying the type of material lacking. When referring to abstract concepts, consider using alternative phrases like "have no substance" or "lack relevance" for better precision. Overall, "have no material" is a valuable tool for conveying a state of deficiency or absence, so, pay attention to the specific meaning you want to transmit.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

have no financial stake

Specifically indicates the absence of any investment or monetary involvement.

do not own physical property

Specifically indicates the absence of owning physical assets.

lack any tangible assets

Highlights the absence of assets that can be physically touched or quantified.

lack a material connection

Highlights the absence of a tangible link or relationship.

are devoid of possessions

Stresses the condition of being without any belongings.

possess no physical resources

Focuses on the absence of physical assets or resources.

have no worldly goods

Specifies the absence of material wealth in a broader sense.

are without physical means

Focuses on the absence of resources that can directly satisfy needs.

do not have any substance

Emphasizes a lack of depth, importance or solid factual basis.

have no practical significance

Shifts the focus to the absence of real-world importance or effect.

FAQs

How can I use "have no material" in a sentence?

You can use "have no material" to indicate the absence of physical possessions, resources, or evidence. For example, "They "have no material" wealth", or "The investigation "has no material" evidence."

What's a more formal way to say "have no material"?

More formal alternatives include "lack tangible assets", "possess no physical resources", or "are devoid of possessions". Depending on the specific context, "lack tangible assets" can be appropriate in formal writing.

Is it correct to use "have no material" when referring to something non-physical?

While grammatically correct, it's generally better to use alternatives like "have no substance", "have no relevance", or "have no bearing" when discussing non-physical concepts.

What's the difference between "have no material effect" and "have no effect"?

"Have no material effect" implies that the impact is negligible or insignificant, especially in a financial or practical sense. "Have no effect" generally indicates a complete absence of impact. For example, A Rite Aid spokeswoman, Karen Rugen, said the inquiry was expected to "have no material impact" on the company, or Walcott's injury means it would "have no material effect" were he to be banned by the Football Association.