have evidence

USAGE SUMMARY

"have evidence" is a valid and usable phrase in written English.
You can use it when referring to an individual or group having evidence to support a claim. For example, "The prosecution must have evidence to prove the defendant's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Formal & Business

Wiki

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

We have evidence.

The New Yorker

Now they have evidence.

The New York Times

Now they have evidence that it does.

The New York Times

Does anyone have evidence to the contrary?

The New York Times

We don't have evidence of that.

The New York Times - Sports

But we have evidence for only three.

The Guardian - Tech

Oh, you have "evidence" do you?

The Guardian

But now we finally have evidence.

The Guardian - TV & Radio

So we have evidence to prove that".

The New York Times - Sports

Did I have evidence against him?

The Guardian

"I don't have evidence of it.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "have evidence", ensure the evidence is relevant, credible, and sufficient to support the claim you are making. State the claim first, then introduce the evidence to provide context for the reader.

Common error

Avoid using "have evidence" when you only possess weak or circumstantial evidence. Instead, qualify your statement with phrases like "suggests" or "indicates" to accurately reflect the strength of your support.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "have evidence" functions as a verb phrase, typically used to indicate the possession of information or data that supports a claim or assertion. This phrase suggests that there is some form of factual basis to back up a statement, as exemplified in the Ludwig examples.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

62%

Science

27%

Formal & Business

5%

Less common in

Wiki

4%

Encyclopedias

0%

Social Media

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "have evidence" is a common and grammatically correct expression used to indicate the possession of proof or support for a claim. As Ludwig AI confirms, it's widely used across various contexts, particularly in news, science, and formal business settings. The phrase functions to assert the existence of supporting facts, strengthening the credibility of a statement. While there are many semantically related alternatives, such as "possess proof" or "hold substantiation", the choice depends on the specific nuance and formality required. Remember to use the phrase accurately, ensuring the evidence is relevant and sufficient to support your claim.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

possess proof

Replaces "evidence" with "proof", emphasizing the conclusive nature of the supporting information.

hold substantiation

Uses "substantiation" instead of "evidence", suggesting a more formal or official confirmation.

have confirmation

Replaces "evidence" with "confirmation", highlighting the act of verifying or validating information.

have corroboration

Uses "corroboration" to indicate that the evidence supports or confirms a theory or finding.

possess validation

Focuses on the act of validating something, rather than just having evidence.

can demonstrate

Shifts focus from possessing evidence to the ability to show or prove something.

can substantiate

Similar to "can demonstrate", but with a stronger emphasis on providing solid support.

can prove

More direct, focusing on the ability to conclusively establish something as true.

are able to verify

Highlights the capability to confirm the accuracy or truth of something using evidence.

can attest to

Indicates that one can vouch for something based on personal experience or knowledge, implying evidence.

FAQs

How can I use "have evidence" in a sentence?

You can use "have evidence" to indicate that someone possesses proof or support for a claim. For example, "The detectives "have evidence" linking the suspect to the crime scene."

What can I say instead of "have evidence"?

You can use alternatives like "possess proof", "hold substantiation", or "have confirmation" depending on the context.

Which is correct, "have evidence" or "has evidence"?

"Have evidence" is used with plural subjects (e.g., they, we), while "has evidence" is used with singular subjects (e.g., he, she, it). For example, "They "have evidence"", but "He "has evidence"."

What's the difference between "have evidence" and "have proof"?

"Evidence" refers to information that supports a claim, while "proof" implies a higher degree of certainty and conclusiveness. While ""have evidence"" suggests supporting information exists, "have proof" suggests the matter is settled beyond reasonable doubt.