Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
have chopped
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase "have chopped" is correct and usable in written English.
It is typically used in the present perfect tense to indicate that the action of chopping has been completed at some point in the past and is relevant to the present. Example: "I have chopped all the vegetables for the salad."
✓ Grammatically correct
News & Media
Formal & Business
Science
Alternative expressions(4)
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
60 human-written examples
"Well, WE have chopped liver," said the client firmly.
News & Media
The Independent and Express have chopped and changed diaries.
News & Media
By the end, you'll have chopped a thousand carrots.
News & Media
"They shouldn't have chopped down a grove of beech trees," I said sternly, improvising.
News & Media
But amid Europe's economic malaise, many companies have chopped back production, leaving them with excess allowances.
News & Media
They have chopped off the bull's head and cut it into 11 pieces.
News & Media
Punishment is severe: the rebels have chopped off the feet of young men caught riding bicycles.
News & Media
Or have chopped tuna tartar drizzled with scallion and cucumber dressing, a brilliant touch.
News & Media
If it had not worked you would have chopped off my head.
News & Media
Tillie's seminar went way overtime, but if anyone had stopped her, I would have chopped their head off".
News & Media
"We should have chopped them off when we found out that they were insolvent," he told The Independent.
News & Media
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
When describing food preparation, be specific. Use "have diced" for uniform cubes and "have minced" for very small pieces instead of just "have chopped" for clarity.
Common error
In formal writing, avoid overusing the phrase "have chopped" when more precise verbs like "have reduced" or "have curtailed" would be more appropriate to convey a specific meaning.
Source & Trust
88%
Authority and reliability
4.6/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "have chopped" primarily functions as a verb phrase in the present perfect tense. It describes a completed action of cutting something into pieces, often with a sense of force or irregularity. Ludwig AI confirms its frequent usage in various contexts.
Frequent in
News & Media
70%
Formal & Business
15%
Science
5%
Less common in
Wiki
3%
Encyclopedias
2%
Academia
5%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
In summary, "have chopped" is a common and grammatically sound verb phrase used to describe a completed action of cutting something into pieces. According to Ludwig AI, it's most frequently found in News & Media contexts, though it also appears in Formal & Business and Scientific settings. While the phrase is generally neutral in register, it's important to consider the specific context when choosing "have chopped" over more precise alternatives like "have diced" or "have minced". Overusing the phrase, especially in formal writing, can be avoided by opting for alternatives such as "have reduced" or "have curtailed" when appropriate.
More alternative expressions(10)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
have sliced
This alternative focuses on cutting into thin, flat pieces, implying a different method of cutting than "have chopped".
have diced
This alternative implies cutting into small, uniform cubes, a more precise action than "have chopped".
have minced
This alternative suggests cutting into very small pieces, often used for ingredients like garlic or meat.
have severed
This alternative implies a complete separation by cutting, suggesting a more forceful action than "have chopped".
have reduced
This alternative suggests decreasing something. It is a more generic way of saying "have chopped" when talking about cutting costs or budget.
have cut back
This alternative implies a reduction or curtailment, often in the context of expenses or production.
have trimmed
This alternative suggests removing small parts to neaten or shape something, often used for hair or plants.
have lessened
This alternative implies diminishing something, such as an amount or intensity.
have diminished
This alternative means to make or become less, indicating a reduction in size, importance, or intensity.
have decreased
This alternative indicates a numerical reduction or decline.
FAQs
What does "have chopped" mean?
The phrase "have chopped" means that someone has cut something into pieces using a sharp tool such as a knife or an axe. It's used in the present perfect tense to describe an action completed in the past that has relevance to the present.
How can I use "have chopped" in a sentence?
You can use "have chopped" to describe the act of cutting something into pieces. For example, "I "have chopped" the vegetables for the soup" or "They "have chopped" down the old tree in the backyard".
What can I say instead of "have chopped" when referring to food preparation?
Depending on the context, you can use alternatives such as "have diced", "have minced", or "have sliced" to be more specific about the cutting method.
Is it better to say "have chopped" or "have cut"?
While "have cut" is a more general term for dividing something, ""have chopped"" implies a rougher, less precise cutting action. Use ""have chopped"" when describing something being cut into irregular pieces.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
88%
Authority and reliability
4.6/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested