have reduced

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "have reduced" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to indicate that a reduction has occurred at some point in the past and may still be relevant to the present. Example: "The company has reduced its carbon emissions significantly over the past year."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Academia

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Indeed, many have reduced them.

The Economist

We have reduced overtime.

The New York Times

How could dry laws have reduced crime?

The New York Times

Venture capitalists also have reduced their investments.

The New York Times

Several factors have reduced diversity, he argues.

The Economist

Many colleges have reduced class offerings.

The New York Times

And they have reduced their risk-taking.

The New York Times

But we have reduced it.

The New York Times - Science

He may have reduced them.

The Washington Post

Some, like Chanterelle, have reduced prices.

The New York Times - Food

Those laws have reduced accidental shootings.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "have reduced", ensure the context clearly indicates what has been reduced and the extent of the reduction. Providing specific numbers or percentages strengthens the statement.

Common error

Avoid using "have reduced" when the reduction is negligible or insignificant. Instead, use more precise language that reflects the actual change.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "have reduced" functions as a present perfect verb phrase, indicating that an action of reducing occurred at some point in the past and its effects may continue to the present. Ludwig AI confirms this through numerous examples demonstrating its use across various domains.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

48%

Science

28%

Academia

22%

Less common in

Formal & Business

2%

Reference

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "have reduced" is a versatile and frequently used verb phrase that indicates a past action of diminishing something. Ludwig AI's analysis, supported by numerous examples from authoritative sources, shows that the phrase is grammatically correct and suitable for a wide range of contexts, particularly in news, science, and academic writing. While "have reduced" is generally neutral to formal, it's crucial to ensure clarity by specifying what exactly has been reduced.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

have decreased

Direct synonym; replaces "reduced" with "decreased", maintaining the same meaning.

have lowered

A simple synonym for making something less.

have lessened

Replaces "reduced" with "lessened", suggesting a smaller degree of reduction.

have diminished

Replaces "reduced" with "diminished", often implying a more gradual decrease.

have curtailed

Suggests limiting or restricting something, similar to reducing.

have cut back

An informal phrasal verb meaning to reduce, especially spending.

have minimized

Implies reducing something to the smallest possible amount.

have shrunk

Suggests a reduction in size or quantity.

have alleviated

Implies reducing the intensity or severity of something.

have mitigated

Similar to alleviated, suggesting a reduction in the negative impact of something.

FAQs

How can I use "have reduced" in a sentence?

Use "have reduced" to indicate that something has been made smaller or less. For example: "The company "has reduced its carbon emissions"".

What's the difference between "have reduced" and "have decreased"?

"Have reduced" and "have decreased" are often interchangeable, but "have reduced" can sometimes imply a more active effort to diminish something.

What can I say instead of "have reduced"?

You can use alternatives like "have lessened", "have diminished", or "have lowered" depending on the context.

Is it always necessary to specify what "have reduced" refers to?

While not always mandatory, specifying what "have reduced" refers to provides clarity and avoids ambiguity. For instance, saying "they have reduced spending" is clearer than simply saying "they have reduced".