Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

have been recognized

Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

USAGE SUMMARY

"have been recognized" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when talking about something that has been acknowledged or accepted. For example, "Her great accomplishments have been recognized by many."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

Encyclopedias

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

59 human-written examples

Several generations of greenstones have been recognized.

I think bubbles have been recognized.

News & Media

The New Yorker

However, harmful environmental consequences have been recognized.

Heteroatom doped graphenes have been recognized as the promising candidate.

Science

Carbon

Discoveries here have been recognized by six Nobel prizes.

News & Media

The New York Times

Traditionally, two major groups of pterosaurs have been recognized.

Encyclopedias

Britannica

Two basic types of granite have been recognized.

Encyclopedias

Britannica

More than 300 forms of calcite have been recognized.

Encyclopedias

Britannica

Up to five subspecies of Elegant Quail have been recognized.

Such governmental purposes long have been recognized as legitimate.

Three principal origins of meromixis have been recognized.

Show more...

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "have been recognized", ensure the subject performing the recognition is clear, either explicitly stated or implied by the context. For instance, "The benefits of exercise have been recognized by doctors" is more direct than "The benefits of exercise have been recognized."

Common error

Avoid using "have been recognized" without specifying who did the recognizing. This can lead to ambiguity and weaken the statement. For example, instead of saying "Side effects have been recognized", specify "Side effects have been recognized by researchers".

Antonio Rotolo, PhD - Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Source & Trust

82%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Linguistic Context

The phrase "have been recognized" functions as a passive voice construction indicating that a subject has received acknowledgment or acceptance. As Ludwig AI indicates, it is grammatically sound and widely used. The phrase often implies that the recognition occurred in the past but its effects or implications continue to the present.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

57%

Encyclopedias

16%

News & Media

11%

Less common in

Formal & Business

2%

Wiki

2%

Academia

2%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "have been recognized" is a grammatically correct and widely used passive construction, indicating that something has been acknowledged or accepted. As Ludwig AI states, it is commonly found in formal contexts like scientific publications, encyclopedias, and news articles. Its function is to convey the established validity or acceptance of a concept, fact, or achievement. To ensure clarity, it's essential to specify who did the recognizing. Alternatives include "have been identified", "have been acknowledged", and "have been established", offering nuanced ways to express similar meanings.

FAQs

How can I use "have been recognized" in a sentence?

You can use "have been recognized" to indicate that something has been acknowledged or accepted. For example, "Her achievements "have been recognized" by the committee".

What can I say instead of "have been recognized"?

You can use alternatives like "have been identified", "have been acknowledged", or "have been established" depending on the context.

Is it correct to say "has been recognized" instead of "have been recognized"?

Yes, but the choice depends on the subject. Use "has been recognized" for singular subjects (e.g., "The problem has been recognized"), and "have been recognized" for plural subjects (e.g., "The problems "have been recognized"").

What's the difference between "have been recognized" and "are recognized"?

"Have been recognized" implies a completed action in the past that continues to be relevant, while "are recognized" describes a current state of recognition. For example, "The dangers of smoking "have been recognized"" suggests the recognition happened in the past and continues today, whereas "The dangers of smoking are recognized" simply states that they are currently acknowledged.

ChatGPT power + Grammarly precisionChatGPT power + Grammarly precision
ChatGPT + Grammarly

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Source & Trust

82%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences: