Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

have been described

Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "have been described" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when referring to something that has been characterized or explained in the past and continues to be relevant. Example: "The symptoms of the disease have been described in various medical journals over the years."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Encyclopedias

Wiki

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

More than 500 species have been described.

About 500 species have been described.

Nearly 1,000 cirripede species have been described.

Some closures have been described as suspensions.

News & Media

The Guardian

When you sing it you have been described as punishing, you have been described as relentless.

News & Media

The New Yorker

parvifolia have been described.

Different effects have been described.

They have been described as nice.

News & Media

TechCrunch

Several operational techniques have been described.

Three types of osteotomies have been described.

Primary and secondary forms have been described.

Show more...

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "have been described", ensure that the context clearly indicates where or by whom the description was provided. This adds credibility and allows readers to find more information if needed.

Common error

Avoid using "have been described" without specifying who provided the description or where it can be found. This can make the statement vague and less persuasive.

Antonio Rotolo, PhD - Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Source & Trust

81%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Linguistic Context

The phrase "have been described" functions as a passive construction, indicating that something has received a description. As Ludwig AI highlights, this construction is commonly used across varied contexts to convey that information regarding a subject has been documented or characterized.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

59%

Wiki

15%

News & Media

10%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

5%

Formal & Business

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "have been described" functions as a passive voice construction used to indicate that something has been characterized or explained, often in a formal context. According to Ludwig AI, this phrase is grammatically correct and usable across a wide array of contexts. Predominantly found within scientific literature and academic writing, the phrase serves to reference existing knowledge, emphasizing that a subject has received prior documentation or characterization. Its formality is further reinforced by its prevalent use in science, wiki, and encyclopedic contexts. When utilizing "have been described", clarity can be improved by specifying the source of the description. Alternative phrases include "have been characterized" or "have been outlined", each offering subtle nuances in meaning.

FAQs

How can I use "have been described" in a sentence?

Use "have been described" to indicate that something has been characterized or explained. For example, "The symptoms of the disease "have been described" in detail in medical journals".

What are some alternatives to "have been described"?

Alternatives include "have been characterized", "have been defined", or "have been outlined", depending on the specific nuance you want to convey.

What is the difference between "have been described" and "have been explained"?

"Have been described" generally refers to a characterization or account of something, while "have been explained" implies that something complex has been made understandable.

Is it necessary to specify who or what source "have been described" something?

While not always grammatically required, specifying the source of the description adds credibility and provides context. For instance, "The effects "have been described" by researchers at MIT" is more informative than "The effects "have been described"".

ChatGPT power + Grammarly precisionChatGPT power + Grammarly precision
ChatGPT + Grammarly

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Source & Trust

81%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences: