has resulted in

USAGE SUMMARY

"has resulted in" is a valid phrase that can be used in written English.
You usually use it when referring to an outcome or consequence of a particular action or event. For example, "The increase in public debt has resulted in an unstable economy."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

This has resulted in numerous speeding tickets.

The New York Times

This has resulted in some strange theatrics.

The New York Times

"This has resulted in nothing".

The New York Times

Her situation has resulted in considerable distress".

The Guardian

That has resulted in an uncertain supply.

The New York Times

That has resulted in different approaches.

The New York Times

Football success has resulted in tangible benefits.

The New York Times

His high-speed passing has resulted in a new spontaneity.

The New York Times - Sports

Unlimited spending has resulted in unlimited television combat.

The New York Times - Magazine

That view has resulted in some odd role reversals.

The New York Times - Books

That dedication has resulted in some remarkable performances.

The New York Times - Sports

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "has resulted in", ensure the cause-and-effect relationship is evident and logical to the reader. Avoid making unsupported claims or exaggerating the impact.

Common error

Avoid using "has resulted in" when you only observe a correlation. Ensure there's a direct causal link rather than a coincidental relationship to maintain credibility.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "has resulted in" functions as a causal connector, linking a preceding action or event to its outcome or consequence. Ludwig examples confirm its usage across varied contexts to express cause-and-effect relationships.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

40%

Science

35%

Formal & Business

10%

Less common in

Reference

5%

Social Media

5%

Encyclopedias

5%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "has resulted in" functions as a causal connector, effectively linking actions or events to their outcomes. As Ludwig AI indicates, the phrase is grammatically correct and widely used. It is most commonly found in news, media, and scientific contexts. For clear and effective writing, ensure a logical cause-and-effect relationship when using this phrase. Avoid confusing correlation with causation. Alternatives include "has led to" and "has caused". The phrase is suitable for neutral to formal registers, making it a versatile choice for diverse writing needs.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

has led to

A more direct and commonly used alternative, focusing on the immediate consequence.

has caused

Implies a more direct and forceful action leading to a specific result.

has generated

Suggests the creation or production of something as a result.

has brought about

A more formal and emphatic way of saying "has caused".

has given rise to

Implies a gradual development or emergence of something as a result.

has contributed to

Indicates that the phrase was one of several factors influencing a result.

has been instrumental in

Emphasizes the importance of the action as a key factor in achieving the result.

has played a part in

Similar to "has contributed to", but suggests a less significant role.

has affected

A broader term that indicates an influence, but not necessarily a direct result.

has impacted

Similar to "has affected", but often implies a more significant or dramatic influence.

FAQs

How can I use "has resulted in" in a sentence?

Use "has resulted in" to show a direct consequence of an action or event. For example, "The new policy "has resulted in" increased efficiency".

What are some alternatives to "has resulted in"?

You can use alternatives like "has led to", "has caused", or "has brought about" depending on the specific context.

Is it always necessary to specify the cause when using "has resulted in"?

Yes, for clarity, it's important to specify what the cause is when using "has resulted in". For instance, instead of saying "It "has resulted in" improvements", specify "The new training program "has resulted in" improvements".

What's the difference between "has resulted in" and "has contributed to"?

"Has resulted in" implies a direct cause-and-effect relationship, while "has contributed to" suggests that the factor was one of several influencing the outcome. The phrase "has resulted in" is used if the effect is mostly due to that cause, while the alternative "has contributed to" is used when the cause is one of the many.