has resulted

USAGE SUMMARY

"has resulted" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when you want to refer to the outcome of a particular situation or action. For example: "The increased attention to public health initiatives has resulted in a dramatic decrease in illness-related fatalities in the past five years."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Academia

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Illness has resulted.

The New Yorker

Some confusion has resulted.

The New York Times

This has resulted in numerous speeding tickets.

The New York Times

This has resulted in some strange theatrics.

The New York Times

"This has resulted in nothing".

The New York Times

This has resulted in two major books.

Harvard University

Her situation has resulted in considerable distress".

The Guardian

Research has resulted in these breakthroughs.

Harvard University

This has resulted from a compromise.

Cornell University

That has resulted in an uncertain supply.

The New York Times

That has resulted in different approaches.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "has resulted" to clearly indicate a cause-and-effect relationship between two events or situations. This helps to clarify the logic and flow of your writing.

Common error

Avoid using "has resulted" in overly passive constructions. For example, instead of saying "it has resulted in being done", prefer a more direct construction like "it has resulted in its completion" or, even better, "it has resulted in completing it."

Linguistic Context

The phrase "has resulted" functions as a verb phrase indicating a cause-and-effect relationship. It connects an action or situation with its consequence or outcome. As Ludwig AI indicates, it is grammatically correct and widely used.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

62%

Academia

25%

Science

6%

Less common in

Formal & Business

4%

Wiki

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "has resulted" is a grammatically correct and commonly used verb phrase to indicate a cause-and-effect relationship. It is versatile and appears across various contexts, especially in News & Media and Academia. As Ludwig AI points out, it's a clear way to present outcomes stemming from specific actions or situations. To ensure clarity, it's best used in active voice and to avoid overly complex constructions. While various alternatives exist, such as ""has led to"" or ""has caused"", "has resulted" offers a direct and effective way to communicate consequences.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

has led to

Replaces "resulted" with "led", emphasizing direction and guidance toward the outcome.

has caused

Focuses on the action that brought about the result, highlighting causation.

has generated

Highlights the creation or production of the result.

has produced

Similar to "generated", emphasizing the output or yield.

has brought about

Emphasizes the act of causing something to happen.

has given rise to

Focuses on the emergence or beginning of something new.

has contributed to

Highlights the role of something in influencing the final result.

has created

Focuses on the making or formation of the outcome.

has affected

Shows how something has impacted or changed the situation.

has culminated in

Emphasizes that the result is the final point in a process or series of events.

FAQs

How can I use "has resulted" in a sentence?

Use "has resulted" to show a cause-and-effect relationship. For example, "The new policy "has resulted in" increased efficiency."

What are some alternatives to "has resulted"?

Alternatives include "has led to", "has caused", or "has generated", depending on the specific nuance you want to convey.

Is it appropriate to use "has resulted" in formal writing?

Yes, "has resulted" is appropriate for formal writing. It's a clear and concise way to express cause and effect, suitable for academic, business, and journalistic contexts.

What's the difference between "has resulted in" and "has resulted from"?

"Has resulted in" indicates the effect or outcome, while "has resulted from" indicates the cause or origin. For example, "The experiment has resulted in new data" versus "The new data "has resulted from" the experiment".